wireguard.lists.zx2c4.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>,
	 "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com
Subject: [PATCH net] wireguard: fix race in wg_index_hashtable_replace()
Date: Tue,  8 Sep 2020 07:59:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200908145911.4090480-1-edumazet@google.com> (raw)

syzbot got a NULL dereference in wg_index_hashtable_replace() [1]

Issue here is that right after checking hlist_unhashed(&old->index_hash)
another cpu might have removed @old already from the hash.

Since we are dealing with a very unlikely case, we can simply
acquire the table lock earlier.

[1]
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007]
CPU: 0 PID: 7395 Comm: kworker/0:3 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc4-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Workqueue: wg-kex-wg1 wg_packet_handshake_receive_worker
RIP: 0010:hlist_replace_rcu include/linux/rculist.h:505 [inline]
RIP: 0010:wg_index_hashtable_replace+0x176/0x330 drivers/net/wireguard/peerlookup.c:174
Code: 00 fc ff df 48 89 f9 48 c1 e9 03 80 3c 01 00 0f 85 44 01 00 00 48 b9 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 8b 45 10 48 89 c6 48 c1 ee 03 <80> 3c 0e 00 0f 85 06 01 00 00 48 85 d2 4c 89 28 74 47 e8 a3 4f b5
RSP: 0018:ffffc90006a97bf8 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888050ffc4f8 RCX: dffffc0000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88808e04e010
RBP: ffff88808e04e000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff8880543d0000
R10: ffffed100a87a000 R11: 000000000000016e R12: ffff8880543d0000
R13: ffff88808e04e008 R14: ffff888050ffc508 R15: ffff888050ffc500
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880ae600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00000000f5505db0 CR3: 0000000097cf7000 CR4: 00000000001526f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 wg_noise_handshake_begin_session+0x752/0xc9a drivers/net/wireguard/noise.c:820
 wg_receive_handshake_packet drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c:183 [inline]
 wg_packet_handshake_receive_worker+0x33b/0x730 drivers/net/wireguard/receive.c:220
 process_one_work+0x94c/0x1670 kernel/workqueue.c:2269
 worker_thread+0x64c/0x1120 kernel/workqueue.c:2415
 kthread+0x3b5/0x4a0 kernel/kthread.c:292
 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace 0d737db78b72da84 ]---
RIP: 0010:hlist_replace_rcu include/linux/rculist.h:505 [inline]
RIP: 0010:wg_index_hashtable_replace+0x176/0x330 drivers/net/wireguard/peerlookup.c:174
Code: 00 fc ff df 48 89 f9 48 c1 e9 03 80 3c 01 00 0f 85 44 01 00 00 48 b9 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 8b 45 10 48 89 c6 48 c1 ee 03 <80> 3c 0e 00 0f 85 06 01 00 00 48 85 d2 4c 89 28 74 47 e8 a3 4f b5
RSP: 0018:ffffc90006a97bf8 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff888050ffc4f8 RCX: dffffc0000000000
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffff88808e04e010
RBP: ffff88808e04e000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffff8880543d0000
R10: ffffed100a87a000 R11: 000000000000016e R12: ffff8880543d0000
R13: ffff88808e04e008 R14: ffff888050ffc508 R15: ffff888050ffc500
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880ae600000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00000000f5505db0 CR3: 0000000097cf7000 CR4: 00000000001526f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400

Fixes: e7096c131e51 ("net: WireGuard secure network tunnel")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Cc: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com
---
 drivers/net/wireguard/peerlookup.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireguard/peerlookup.c b/drivers/net/wireguard/peerlookup.c
index e4deb331476b3d67c1d24eb269b26f587798cbc2..d82eba263292474a7cdfb133b2ba1862a2e9352c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireguard/peerlookup.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireguard/peerlookup.c
@@ -167,21 +167,25 @@ bool wg_index_hashtable_replace(struct index_hashtable *table,
 				struct index_hashtable_entry *old,
 				struct index_hashtable_entry *new)
 {
-	if (unlikely(hlist_unhashed(&old->index_hash)))
-		return false;
+
+	bool replaced = false;
+
 	spin_lock_bh(&table->lock);
-	new->index = old->index;
-	hlist_replace_rcu(&old->index_hash, &new->index_hash);
+	if (likely(!hlist_unhashed(&old->index_hash))) {
+		replaced = true;
+		new->index = old->index;
+		hlist_replace_rcu(&old->index_hash, &new->index_hash);
 
-	/* Calling init here NULLs out index_hash, and in fact after this
-	 * function returns, it's theoretically possible for this to get
-	 * reinserted elsewhere. That means the RCU lookup below might either
-	 * terminate early or jump between buckets, in which case the packet
-	 * simply gets dropped, which isn't terrible.
-	 */
-	INIT_HLIST_NODE(&old->index_hash);
+		/* Calling init here NULLs out index_hash, and in fact after this
+		 * function returns, it's theoretically possible for this to get
+		 * reinserted elsewhere. That means the RCU lookup below might either
+		 * terminate early or jump between buckets, in which case the packet
+		 * simply gets dropped, which isn't terrible.
+		 */
+		INIT_HLIST_NODE(&old->index_hash);
+	}
 	spin_unlock_bh(&table->lock);
-	return true;
+	return replaced;
 }
 
 void wg_index_hashtable_remove(struct index_hashtable *table,
-- 
2.28.0.526.ge36021eeef-goog


             reply	other threads:[~2020-09-08 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-08 14:59 Eric Dumazet [this message]
2020-09-08 15:25 ` [PATCH net] wireguard: fix race in wg_index_hashtable_replace() Jason A. Donenfeld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200908145911.4090480-1-edumazet@google.com \
    --to=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzkaller@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).