From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: neumann@cgws.de Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id be25a8f0 for ; Wed, 16 May 2018 19:32:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.dabax.net (mail.dabax.net [88.99.12.75]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 84d0311c for ; Wed, 16 May 2018 19:32:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 May 2018 21:32:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <793381ba-b59d-50e4-6d7b-cbe9bef91ba1@cgws.de> <489c2f57-574a-1223-9c4d-266904e52c94@gmail.com> <20180515202126.yw57deh6st5ebnk6@kowloon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----41J1W131W4EE11PWCVCBD7WW6S84AW" Subject: Re: Need for HW-clock independent timestamps To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com, Kalin KOZHUHAROV , Devan Carpenter From: Axel Neumann Message-ID: <20C72316-B8FC-4515-8DC8-8BC82BF3864F@cgws.de> Cc: WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , ------41J1W131W4EE11PWCVCBD7WW6S84AW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 15=2E Mai 2018 22:49:15 MESZ schrieb Kalin KOZHUHAROV : >On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:21 PM, Devan Carpenter=20 >> Using NTP is not a viable solution for a distributed mesh network=2E >What >> if the Internet is only accesible via WG, or what if the network is >not >> connected to the Internet at all? >> >Why do you need the Internet at all? >You can do as simple as plug a $20 GPS receiver (serial/USB) in any >node and get precise time that is shared with others in the network=2E $20 would increase the HW cost of many typical community-networks (CN) dep= loyments significantly=2E Plus requiering more knowledge, maintenence, and = power supply for sometimes solar-powered setups=2E Think of a recent typica= l CN node like this [1], so no usb=2E The admins are not hackers=2E Also th= ere are tens of thousands of existing and productively operating (partially= 5-10-years-old) nodes that nobody wants to upgrade HW wise=2E=20 It is really NOT as simple as it sounds to plug a $20 GPS !!! [1] https://www=2Etp-link=2Ecom/en/products/details/cat-37_CPE510=2Ehtml /axel --=20 Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Ger=C3=A4t mit K-9 Mail gesendet= =2E ------41J1W131W4EE11PWCVCBD7WW6S84AW Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Am 15=2E Mai 2018 22:49:15 MESZ schrieb Kalin KOZHUHAROV <me=2Ekalin@gm= ail=2Ecom>:
>On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:21 PM, Devan Carpenter

>> Using NTP is not a viable solution for a distributed mesh network= =2E
>What
>> if the Internet is only accesible via WG, or what if the network = is
>not
>> connected to the Internet at all?
>>
>Why do you need the Internet at all?
>You can do as simple as plug a $20 GPS receiver (serial/USB) in any >node and get precise time that is shared with others in the network=2E=

$20 would increase the HW cost of many typical community-networks (CN) dep= loyments significantly=2E Plus requiering more knowledge, maintenence, and = power supply for sometimes solar-powered setups=2E Think of a recent typica= l CN node like this [1], so no usb=2E The admins are not hackers=2E Also th= ere are tens of thousands of existing and productively operating (partially= 5-10-years-old) nodes that nobody wants to upgrade HW wise=2E
It is really NOT as simple as it sounds to plug a $20 GPS !!!

[1] https://www=2Etp-link=2Ecom/en/products/details/cat-37_CPE510=2E= html


/axel



--
Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Ger=C3=A4t mit K-9 Mail gesendet= =2E ------41J1W131W4EE11PWCVCBD7WW6S84AW--