wireguard.lists.zx2c4.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julian Orth <ju.orth@gmail.com>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>, wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com
Subject: Re: Userspace Networking Stack + WireGuard + Go
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 17:26:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <33997a3d-591e-9aa3-92fe-a06a4d3c5b26@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <X/8aDfdkod+rCPqK@zx2c4.com>

On 13/01/2021 17.04, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:

 > Even if you're unprivileged and want a WireGuard interface for just a
 > single application that's bound to the lifetime of that application,
 > you can still use WireGuard's normal kernel interface inside of a user
 > namespace + a network namespace, and get a private process-specific
 > WireGuard interface.

That's what my patches from back in 2018 were trying to accomplish.
Unless I've missed something since, I do not see how what you're
describing would work.  Unless you also

- create a TUN device in the network namespace
- add a default route through that TUN device
- manually route all traffic between the init network namespace and your
   network namespace.

Is that what you meant or is there a simpler way?

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-13 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-13 16:04 Userspace Networking Stack + WireGuard + Go Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-01-13 16:26 ` Julian Orth [this message]
2021-01-13 16:33   ` network namespace wireguard routing [Was: Re: Userspace Networking Stack + WireGuard + Go] Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-01-13 16:40     ` Julian Orth
2021-01-13 16:46     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-01-13 16:49       ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2021-01-14 10:44         ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2021-01-15  8:12   ` Userspace Networking Stack + WireGuard + Go Marc-André Lureau
2021-01-14 23:25 ` Jason A. Donenfeld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=33997a3d-591e-9aa3-92fe-a06a4d3c5b26@gmail.com \
    --to=ju.orth@gmail.com \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).