From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31103C43387 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 16:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (krantz.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D309720879 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 16:27:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (4096-bit key) header.d=bartschnet.de header.i=@bartschnet.de header.b="kEHDF47j" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D309720879 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bartschnet.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id e98391e0; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 16:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 1db6bf43 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 16:26:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.core-networks.de (mail.core-networks.de [IPv6:2001:1bc0:d::4:9]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 5bb6f2ef for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 16:26:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bartschnet.de; s=2018030201; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Subject:From:To:content-disposition; bh=KcWMji0tyV27PnK9F/l9kNL5Vuvmkb915vGqCqZ0AtE=; b=kEHDF47j/aDROxinI+yFCjIZFC KBccowGPQBql9um0xx3u1eq3OQs+ppmemM1pijsxsX3vJHutcXabCwrRa87VUCx6MVgiL9P/8Orwf SNbie8mYQYti3hpLrJSRJbp0RtGa4CVTkmg0Oz3WDf5zj8OUotaPkqls3BaAf/hoFS6d4uaMXW5iv /ZgdnwJsNpvZrboHmHeHnTQieqKbrS477CeDyqRYWlSHja+SAA95EluOOW1HoOGK6L99Ee76bjhOr BBjo2IYaDINwsRan2oygRwm6hr8kzHuO0AbI0LNaxt4N3SjFvmqj88gzwY+2lJCKwC5p+H19dHGH4 UdvAVEtSW3G5QPkfg+ncy5cQ0z09w1MBdQepzdYC6blQ/EgTUpM3XaEdUTP/m0wz0IQ2UPPn3q2jg x3hxctuXTMXSLl7tZqZZv4Dnje1O0c7pfkHZ0TfUiy/wxoyFURmH/IUOokq3FNE3h6ykk2gY9FOib 1EVMOe8i/D1eSo0GnVthwOPjF3ZzSiwZMzTSj4LAVfYe/qTQ2mmtKQYIKz+htwoRGVZK46xky3qFP Rz4tTPsjucoLHbVuykcj4Gme6WGxGGSUB/L7c3fgaGv+1voZ2PnNLFUUjdblav8MlFZOxNYixhKSx 8LHskUGf6MAv5HVOrBP4GopHwJBGQ2/PHvHWNWUzE=; Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.core-networks.de id 1gcYVa-0003xt-I1 with ESMTPSA (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) for wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 17:27:43 +0100 To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com From: "Rene 'Renne' Bartsch, B.Sc. Informatics" Subject: Behaviour of multiple Allowed-IPs 0.0.0.0/0 or ::0/0? Message-ID: <443f1c88-5c11-36cb-859c-c7105d68cd19@bartschnet.de> Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 17:27:41 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: de-DE X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" Hi, how does Wireguard behave with multiple peers with Allowed-IPs 0.0.0.0/0 or ::0/0? Regards, Renne _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard