WireGuard Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Cc: Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	WireGuard mailing list <wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com>
Subject: Re: organization of wireguard linux kernel repos moving forward
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2019 17:01:41 +0100
Message-ID: <87blshij2y.fsf@toke.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHmME9oUfp_1udMFNMpeXPeoa7aacdNp9Q31eKvoTBpu+G5rpQ@mail.gmail.com>

"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> writes:

> On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 1:43 PM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@toke.dk> wrote:
>> "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com> writes:
>> > 2) wireguard-tools.git will have the userspace utilities and scripts,
>> > such as wg(8) and wg-quick(8), and be easily packageable by distros.
>> > This repo won't be live until we get a bit closer to the 5.6 release,
>> > but when it is live, it will live at:
>> > https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-tools/ [currently 404s]
>> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/zx2c4/wireguard-tools.git/
>> > [currently 404s]
>> Any plans for integrating this further with iproute2? One could imagine
>> either teaching 'ip' about the wireguard-specific config (keys etc), or
>> even just moving the 'wg' binary wholesale into iproute2?
> I'd definitely be interested in this. Back in 2015, that was the plan.
> Then it took a long time to get to where we are now, and since then
> wg(8) has really evolved into its own useful thing. The easiest thing
> would be to move wg(8) wholesale into iproute2 like you suggested;
> that'd allow people to continue using their infrastructure and whatnot
> they've used for a long time now. A more nuanced approach would be
> coming up with a _parallel_ iproute2 tool with mostly the same syntax
> as wg(8) but as a subcommand of ip(8). Originally the latter appealed
> to me, but at this point maybe the former is better after all. I
> suppose something to consider is that wg(8) is actually a
> cross-platform tool now, with a unified syntax across a whole bunch of
> operating systems.

Hmm, I don't really have any opinion about which approach makes the most
sense; I'm primarily concerned with getting the support into iproute2 so
that it is possible to set up and configure a wireguard tunnel "out of
the box". Both approaches would achieve that, I think...

> But it's also just boring C.

Well, we could always rewrite it in Rust or something? ;)

WireGuard mailing list

  reply index

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-09 11:56 Jason A. Donenfeld
2019-12-09 12:43 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-12-09 12:49   ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2019-12-09 16:01     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen [this message]
2019-12-09 16:18     ` David Ahern
2019-12-09 16:36       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-12-26 17:45 ` Jason A. Donenfeld

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87blshij2y.fsf@toke.dk \
    --to=toke@toke.dk \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \


* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

WireGuard Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/wireguard/0 wireguard/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 wireguard wireguard/ https://lore.kernel.org/wireguard \
	public-inbox-index wireguard

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:

AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git