From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D3AC433FF for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 19:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (krantz.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B66E20679 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 19:01:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=czerwinskis.de header.i=@czerwinskis.de header.b="lAI5+B+b"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=czerwinskis.de header.i=@czerwinskis.de header.b="lAI5+B+b" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0B66E20679 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=czerwinskis.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id b47b2081; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 19:01:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 642f2e6d for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 19:01:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from magratgarlick.emantor.de (magratgarlick.emantor.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c17:c88::2]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 70292251 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 19:01:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by magratgarlick.emantor.de (Postfix, from userid 114) id D62DCD1992; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 21:01:32 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=czerwinskis.de; s=mail; t=1565636492; bh=eiNS0MFRSexnVfpxZxHk6Kuz2OjL0YTcEk6nINRKPsE=; h=References:From:To:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:From; b=lAI5+B+bYUsxsCt4OSR54CIY9HK+8AHr/+pRov/mPtp7rxcU20x8e4777CdhKJ1e1 zt3h9Mg2zWj940ton/lYuLcjwfnD3VXXCl7OWh9+U7aPclGBuXHbAbAygEjCWWkLKr XTBaIegK+H9kTU7rFkc4SowMIbT1rLUf8Vla5ieU= Received: from localhost (p200300D21F09A602EABBB32684480F6D.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:d2:1f09:a602:eabb:b326:8448:f6d]) by magratgarlick.emantor.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B171D1990 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 21:01:32 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=czerwinskis.de; s=mail; t=1565636492; bh=eiNS0MFRSexnVfpxZxHk6Kuz2OjL0YTcEk6nINRKPsE=; h=References:From:To:Subject:In-reply-to:Date:From; b=lAI5+B+bYUsxsCt4OSR54CIY9HK+8AHr/+pRov/mPtp7rxcU20x8e4777CdhKJ1e1 zt3h9Mg2zWj940ton/lYuLcjwfnD3VXXCl7OWh9+U7aPclGBuXHbAbAygEjCWWkLKr XTBaIegK+H9kTU7rFkc4SowMIbT1rLUf8Vla5ieU= References: <37fac6bc-b751-02b3-06f5-61b4823b2a17@powerneth.ro> User-agent: mu4e 1.3.4; emacs 26.2 From: Rouven Czerwinski To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com Subject: Re: IS-IS routing protocol In-reply-to: <37fac6bc-b751-02b3-06f5-61b4823b2a17@powerneth.ro> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 21:01:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87mugep5ro.fsf@czerwinskis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" Hi, Lucian Cristian writes: > Has anyone managed to configure IS-IS routing with wireguard interfaces ? > > I've added multicast address to AllowedIPs (AllowedIPs=224.0.0.0/24) but > when I activate ip router isis on the wireguard interface, tcpdump only > shows: unknown ip 8 > > expecting to see something like L1 Lan IIH, hlen: 27, v: 1, pdu-v: 1, > sys-id-len: 6 (0), max-area: 3 (0) > > or > > L2 Lan IIH, hlen: 27, v: 1, pdu-v: 1, sys-id-len: 6 (0), max-area: 3 (0) IS-IS uses layer 2 while wireguard only provides layer 3 connectivity. IS-IS will not work over wireguard. Regards, Emantor _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard