* wireguard + udpspeeder or tinyfecvpn or similar fec
@ 2018-12-08 16:13 dan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 1+ messages in thread
From: dan @ 2018-12-08 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
Is there any consideration being given to adding fec to wireguard?
udpspeeder and tinyfecvpn are good examples here but they lack
essentially everything that makes wireguard great.
It's not ideal to run udpspeeder first and then wireguard over the top
because you lose wireguards roaming capabilities and more.
It's not ideal to run udpspeeder over a wireguard tunnel because it's
basically just hard to utilize.
it's *wierd* to establish a wireguard tunnel, then a udpspeeder
tunnel, and then another wireguard tunnel on top of that. too many
layers, chopping down MTU too much to make it happen.
it would be fantastic to have wireguard integrate some fec
I know that simplicity is a big part of this, but it's not a very
reasonable option to stack this stuff up in layers as that's
substantially higher complexity.
tinyfecvpn is a layer3 tunnel on top of udp speeder. you can do
wireguard then tinyfecvpn on top which is somewhat simple *BUT*
tinyfecvpn is kind of a loose utility without a decent suite of tools
to maintain things.
WireGuard mailing list
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 1+ messages in thread
only message in thread, back to index
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-12-08 16:13 wireguard + udpspeeder or tinyfecvpn or similar fec dan
WireGuard Archive on lore.kernel.org
Archives are clonable:
git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/wireguard/0 wireguard/git/0.git
# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
public-inbox-init -V2 wireguard wireguard/ https://lore.kernel.org/wireguard \
Newsgroup available over NNTP:
AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox