From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MALFORMED_FREEMAIL, MISSING_HEADERS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3206FC10F14 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 00:21:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (krantz.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E59D214DA for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 00:21:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="QHxHueet" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7E59D214DA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 10ee9f63; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 00:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id e539d7d8 for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 00:21:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 4e020bff for ; Fri, 19 Apr 2019 00:21:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id 4so4592800wmf.1 for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:21:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:cc; bh=v3c8R8Tk+bJTVoRjCd6y7kalWKDSY/7ie2e5VKVN98o=; b=QHxHueetTF8h6fWriCwrhZTsOL5yuRkuy/2fsmXwRHtv5Ya86ybvfWrv5b8cD20e/y ngPoTeBS/k5HWLK1J1ROSI9r/CDxc9OvyAHyPWT981Bip0WKr9vjkOuAka5/gMg7O6Hr EdkpQWUCazCXvndnQL4+YTk5z7XummZ/uwfHX6nL9BSqd7ju6/Wq94pa1fX3QYbG+e9y xn9rVuMKE5ALjUD9qXFYrkI5Js7ksMQWbEIp1ZOTpeGMu0HHtBbx4BPAWuAuBLQqSHI8 IG7qn6jiuC4X/oaqNigQHm7yLmT+0RnsEMeXMvG6Dr/gzfy6ugPmWhlgzyPTamVSeHB3 azDQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:cc; bh=v3c8R8Tk+bJTVoRjCd6y7kalWKDSY/7ie2e5VKVN98o=; b=LPNX2IFSWsA+S20dBpcrMrKYODYFPlwmqLpREFQ+yXdvXOz3vWkuQ0oM9SKKxUWjZN ndz+u7uebQEx/72nvga2tMGjr8hb9cGO44om/iH13D4pt5HJqyogwpzByddN+tNN1QuF 2kluoGYoUsZNNsNNspN9bWckQ7oS6wP1yLGkmnfwW6fyJ8LE16YFtpGhUeTIkjaK32dJ xYeM0iqQL2zNaBnS8xV4uhGjyqGtXXuMEEdeHmjYcm6TB0M87LpgfsknqyPgyxoEj835 mzFkWz35K9v5rW4YivYPSPMvweyRkp162J9pFvtcwApFVq+hCrGlRK8TZucFpoDHxFtL UuOg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV82M6Ciy3+iLTQUGMOT7hB0xdvVtdPn7Av3XG6PiezMnf8LNOm /b9i4qq64wp4We5JW0bcytv5hPNJYKhpHE8w6Tmf+A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzB+uT7hmWdgzCQF+sKECMraKtT4AbQX/AcxyHG0Xr43KD2G+kWdUA6DZ+v409tbVCmkiT9gv1fUnPwWCpA4wc= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9609:: with SMTP id y9mr571403wmd.27.1555633268071; Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:21:08 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <676a8baf337fbc174cd065143da771e3@mitteilung.com> In-Reply-To: <676a8baf337fbc174cd065143da771e3@mitteilung.com> From: d tbsky Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 08:20:56 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Feature Request for Multihomed Endpoints Cc: WireGuard mailing list X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" Markus Grundmann > I wish the endpoint was able to pick a explicit outgoing IP address to connect the other endpoint over the 802.3ad interface but the uplink interface address is not recommend for me. What do you think about it? if you search the mail list, you will find this had been discussed several times these years. last year under rhel7 I could make a multi-home environment which wireguard can not work reliably. however I can not reproduce it under netns so can not debug it further. I wonder if there is simple netns configuration to force wireguard binding specific ip address? _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard