wireguard.lists.zx2c4.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gawen ARAB <g@wenarab.com>
To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com
Subject: wirehub - decentralized, peer-to-peer and secure overlay networks built with WireGuard
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 22:12:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CADjxVNq-PPTrzd9qDZK+ZFF8v70eme8n87xBK-77e=PNMGCQwg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3518 bytes --]

Hello,

I've been giving my free time on a side project called WireHub
(https://github.com/gawen/wirehub), which is a simple tool to build
decentralized, peer-to-peer and secure overlay networks. It dynamically
configures WireGuard tunnels, discoverying peers' endpoints via a
authenticated
DHT, going through NATs, and relaying the WireGuard traffic if no P2P
communication is possible.

Overlay networks are defined by a single human-readable file which lists the
hostname and public key for each nodes of the network. Here's an example:

    name test               # network name is 'test'
    subnet 10.0.42.0/24     # overlay subnetwork is 10.0.42.0/24
    workbit 8               # PoW parameter for DHT security

    # a public bootstrap node
    boot P17zMwXJFbBdJEn05RFIMADw9TX5_m2xgf31OgNKX3w bootstrap.wirehub.io

    # Add trusted node 'a.test' to the overlay network.
    # Each trusted node are at least identified by an human-readable
hostname
    # and a base64 public key.
    trust a.test KJ7YGrBeqLLm_JJ1huIS26OnqAVFy57z5UJqjyMagW4

    # If the endpoint of a peer is static, it might be set after the public
key.
    # Note that this is optional, as endpoints can be dynamically found in
the
    # DHT.
    trust b.test eIix5ldvqDzOIrG9ViKTe9TSBlF4g9nUwKi20C06hFM 12.34.56.78

    # By default WireHub assigns nodes an (overlay) private IP, but a static
    # private IP might be defined
    trust c.test 10.0.42.254 kKZzuIm11zkBSHL9ETRwEthIBbLTvz840F_k4mhI_Hs
    ...

To start a peer,

    # wh up ./config private-key ./sk

When a network is up, the node's hostnames are resolved in userland.

    # ping b.test
    PING 10.0.42.2 (10.0.42.2): 56 data bytes
    64 bytes from 10.0.42.2: seq=0 ttl=64 time=106.801 ms
    64 bytes from 10.0.42.2: seq=1 ttl=64 time=49.778 ms

WireGuard and WireHub uses the same Curve25519 key. WireHub keys must be
generated with `wh genkey`, which adds a Proof-of-Work to the generation of
the
Curve25519 key, in order to mitigate Sybil attacks on the DHT. A high
workbit
will require more work to generate a valid key.

    # wh genkey workbit 8       # fast
    MFaqLuutFvNs79Xc9zhOUofIbL3xSLz1uo+RB1xB73s=
    # wh genkey workbit 8 | wh pubkey | wh workbit
    8
    # wh genkey workbit 16      # will take more time to generate
    kLfotsCIfB/7OcDGeLenptfy2Dzav9wmVZjVQ0Gvnk0=
    # wh genkey workbit 16 | wh pubkey | wh workbit
    16

    # wg genkey | wh pubkey | wh workbit    # WireGuard keys have 0 workbit
    0

Under the hood, WireHub runs its own UDP protocol, binding the same UDP port
than the WireGuard interface (for NAT trasversal technique reasons). It
does so using
libpcap. The first byte of a WireHub packet is 0xff, which corresponds to an
invalid WireGuard packet with message type outside the valid range
0x00-0x03.

WireHub currently authenticates its packets with a custom cryptographic
scheme
based on the node's keys. In the future, it might be better to tunnel
WireHub
packets through WireGuard, yet I'm not sure how to do that simply at the
moment,
as WireHub packets are not IP packets but more like authenticated messages.

There's much room for improvement (security, allowed-ips management, more
UDP
hole punching techniques, faster relaying), but it's usable. Docker images
are
provided to ease quick starting.

Feel free to test and give some feedbacks!

Also, I'll be at FOSDEM 2019 next week-end, so see you there! 🍺

Gawen

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4120 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 148 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard

             reply	other threads:[~2019-01-29 21:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-29 21:12 Gawen ARAB [this message]
2019-01-29 23:55 ` wirehub - decentralized, peer-to-peer and secure overlay networks built with WireGuard Steve Gilberd
2019-01-30 11:35   ` Rene 'Renne' Bartsch, B.Sc. Informatics
2019-01-30 15:25   ` Gawen ARAB
2019-01-30 15:46     ` Gawen ARAB
2019-01-30 16:55       ` Rene 'Renne' Bartsch, B.Sc. Informatics

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CADjxVNq-PPTrzd9qDZK+ZFF8v70eme8n87xBK-77e=PNMGCQwg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=g@wenarab.com \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).