From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 379D3C04E87 for ; Sat, 18 May 2019 16:51:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (krantz.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C77DC20872 for ; Sat, 18 May 2019 16:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="ZmjMgvcO" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C77DC20872 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 69c02445; Sat, 18 May 2019 16:49:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id c331d394 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 14:49:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qt1-x82b.google.com (mail-qt1-x82b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 7e6d4a04 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 14:49:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qt1-x82b.google.com with SMTP id a39so1731366qtk.2 for ; Wed, 15 May 2019 07:49:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=8x1bjh51WScfkAh6rMJHThnsRx/zYGZuNGdtOrIONwM=; b=ZmjMgvcO7lmBNcx6hsMac/kLmR6B60YUvu1nvZKD6S4pA6PSW7rMN0DoioO6IcDTu2 JteNb7G1e5dZrDLQAhfJn9JAXj5DImRltBIg7V9jyaK3R+LgebG5+6gnMdTMrBC3mn2n SH5ayezb1Je4FKMb8s0/qzpmMNPYxY9RusWAn1Ey8lhEMHTC74yWqLwV3qxgi8QR0RaT frw5piureRTw1+nfvBIlvLdbzQlrUqNaLaleHXv0MypgDWlnRBWUta1TZu9/UZd5uvrp ZXUKNEXWLzrhEEIEJxgKvpTg6Rst88YxDI6KAzAPI4IxPYg9lH/YF1YYEsWsNtz6ZUUS GUHA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8x1bjh51WScfkAh6rMJHThnsRx/zYGZuNGdtOrIONwM=; b=ZRySZdSfg6gLJIBNohNtqoRTG0cxWR/xSnfLkKibgVRsPcvKxgzaW1ec222/AHxpVN FmD2F6+kKa3e7DJ/kaArZ/RYYU2fVZy3wvE4SVkXO1zFIbqMucZvm3bUOyTGkCh3SU4v ODCANPhcbtqw39fin+ZYlt5ieSPnobNa3dvbsAKMO8iFuE7W2wEvNgy7Lax9H3TlMbn9 Uu2W0JIGunvo5sSoDQy93VqSnJ5G1q5xAVcrP5K/9zBmeoo0vTsEmY78nCXCffuigzce 6CDqu0fnnj6RAAqVJ8U4g1rJvz4H8QFH3gWsf5yPRvlzyKjSO6nG4au0qNFpVMZMGW8x pIJg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVBTS2UcdljdrsfUruDoQTCMOgGso7CiukUcdSK6LqouRLmLUuV LpAPAogKVo3ukRDMAJunM+woTEqL42gbAQL3FtA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyRqRcHE8tTI3F16sjnl1OkIzEvnDPhE9z07RVyM0nQzXCp3u8Vpc5EyJCKM/6ZfxBjG1mC+yfqD3ovfGAksks= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:d2f2:: with SMTP id x47mr34229217qvh.90.1557931790418; Wed, 15 May 2019 07:49:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: =?UTF-8?B?0JjQu9GM0Y8g0KjQuNC/0LjRhtC40L0=?= Date: Wed, 15 May 2019 19:49:39 +0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Openvpn-devel] Wintun performance results To: Lev Stipakov X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 18 May 2019 18:49:03 +0200 Cc: openvpn-devel , wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1108493836826028337==" Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" --===============1108493836826028337== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f3c8240588ee428c" --000000000000f3c8240588ee428c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable it will most probably get lost in mailing list. can we add it to https://openvpn.net website ? something like "performance testing" with full configs provided ? =D1=81=D1=80, 15 =D0=BC=D0=B0=D1=8F 2019 =D0=B3. =D0=B2 18:49, Lev Stipakov= : > Hi guys, > > I made openvpn3 (required changes will be incorporated into main branch a= t > some point) work with wintun and did performance testing in AWS. > > Client: c5.xlarge, Windows Server 2016, patched openvpn3 test client > and OpenVPN Connect 2.7.1.103 (uses tap-windows6, based on openvpn3). > > Server: c5.xlarge, Ubuntu 18.04, openvpn 2.4.4 > > Client and server instances are in the same VPC and placement group. > > iPerf3 running on server: > > > iperf3 -s -B 0.0.0.0 -V > > iPerf3 running on client: > > > iperf3 -c 10.8.0.1 -V (server VPN address) > > iperf3 -c 10.0.0.18 -V (server VPC address) > > Results: > > - no vpn > > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth > [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 8.67 GBytes 7.45 > Gbits/sec sender > [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 8.67 GBytes 7.45 > Gbits/sec receiver > CPU Utilization: local/sender 61.4% (5.6%u/55.8%s), remote/receiver 33.9% > (1.7%u/32.2%s) > > - tap-windows6 > > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth > [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 404 MBytes 339 > Mbits/sec sender > [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 404 MBytes 339 > Mbits/sec receiver > CPU Utilization: local/sender 4.6% (0.3%u/4.3%s), remote/receiver 21.4% > (2.2%u/19.2%s) > > - wintun > > [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth > [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 536 MBytes 449 > Mbits/sec sender > [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 536 MBytes 449 > Mbits/sec receiver > CPU Utilization: local/sender 2.9% (0.1%u/2.8%s), remote/receiver 10.1% > (0.7%u/9.3%s) > > As you see, wintun performs 30% better comparison to tap-windows6 and > incurs significantly less CPU usage. > > -- > -Lev > _______________________________________________ > Openvpn-devel mailing list > Openvpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/openvpn-devel > --000000000000f3c8240588ee428c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
it will most probably get lost in mailing list.
=

=D1=81=D1=80, 15 =D0=BC=D0=B0=D1=8F 2019 =D0=B3. = =D0=B2 18:49, Lev Stipakov <lstip= akov@gmail.com>:
Hi guys,

I made openvpn3 (requi= red changes will be incorporated into main branch at some point) work with = wintun and did performance testing in AWS.

Cl= ient:=C2=A0 =C2=A0 c5.xlarge, Windows Server 2016, patched openvpn3 test cl= ient and OpenVPN Connect 2.7.1.103 (uses tap-windows6, based on openvpn3).<= /div>

Server:=C2=A0 c5.xlarge, Ubuntu 18.04, openvpn 2.4= .4

Client and server instances are in the same VPC= and placement group.

iPerf3 running on server:

> iperf3 -s -B 0.0.0.0 -V

iPerf3 running on client:

> iperf3 -c 10.8.0.= 1 -V (server VPN address)
> iperf3 -c 10.0.0.18 -V (server VPC= address)=C2=A0=C2=A0

Results:

<= /div>
- no vpn

[ ID] Interval=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0Transfer=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0Bandwidth
[=C2=A0=C2=A04]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A00.00-10= .00=C2=A0=C2=A0sec=C2=A0=C2=A08.67 GBytes=C2=A0=C2=A07.45 Gbits/sec=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0sender
[=C2=A0=C2=A04]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A00.00-10.00=C2=A0=C2=A0sec=C2=A0=C2=A08.67 GBytes=C2=A0=C2=A07.45 Gbits/s= ec=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0receiver
CPU Utilization: loc= al/sender 61.4% (5.6%u/55.8%s), remote/receiver 33.9% (1.7%u/32.2%s)
<= div>
- tap-windows6

[ ID] Interval= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0Transfer= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0Bandwidth
[=C2=A0=C2=A04]=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A00.00-10.00=C2=A0=C2=A0sec=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0404 MBytes=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0339 Mbits/sec=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0sender
[=C2= =A0=C2=A04]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A00.00-10.00=C2=A0=C2=A0sec=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0404= MBytes=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0339 Mbits/sec=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0rec= eiver
CPU Utilization: local/sender 4.6% (0.3%u/4.3%s), remote/re= ceiver 21.4% (2.2%u/19.2%s)

- wintun
[ ID] Interval=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0Transfer=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0Bandwidth
[=C2=A0=C2=A04]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A00.00-10.00=C2=A0=C2=A0sec=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0536 MBytes=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0449 Mbits/sec=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0sender
[=C2=A0=C2=A04]=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A00.00-10.00=C2=A0=C2=A0= sec=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0536 MBytes=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0449 Mbits/sec=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0receiver
CPU Utilization: local/sender 2.9% = (0.1%u/2.8%s), remote/receiver 10.1% (0.7%u/9.3%s)

As you see, wintun performs 30% better comparison to tap-windows6 and incu= rs significantly less CPU usage.

--
-Lev
_______________________________________________
Openvpn-devel mailing list
Op= envpn-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listi= nfo/openvpn-devel
--000000000000f3c8240588ee428c-- --===============1108493836826028337== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard --===============1108493836826028337==--