From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC94C43387 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 00:23:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (krantz.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C1DF208E3 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 00:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=zx2c4.com header.i=@zx2c4.com header.b="EacQw4TE" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 1C1DF208E3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zx2c4.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 12ee5344; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 00:20:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 4b86173a for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 00:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com (frisell.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.64]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 21b1ea3a for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 00:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id d49d2705 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 00:11:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=zx2c4.com; h=mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; s=mail; bh=X/WcGVwfhy9XRd4GeMK8DY4eIsU=; b=EacQw4 TEWAosS3X9tu20mjXwL1l3Xbn+n2aXVZhtO9kpaYCy4PgOqkoHxsbKQxTtpclNA7 0/PSmUDHEAz2hhWI91Cz065XpbXn0WQB1Di7HUOLmXsCWbl8XTyUH4yR1+dVa+m/ MvUVSi5xl9RYucUwT05dIq9SHdNv1dEmK/OX/sbynZ7J5XyrV8nooYk2y4cNbkMo XIM7mgco42KUg4xeiPR91a6AqS1B5/W9UQBONfut4xiQLC1KVVojV1YCSqGxgTso bDQL3uW5uI4icdBDlwMszc5Fmc2ZAQq9XSy/zaIujBsK7aw/CrE/mIDy1D6ZgjaI ksius7HXk6ZigZsw== Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id 45ff9154 (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO) for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2019 00:11:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi1-f173.google.com with SMTP id j21so24003755oii.8 for ; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 16:23:07 -0800 (PST) X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWZzCgXDvmnC271sHeN9uJ1wjWnoJ6nhBJL5RaIxqQb8cnRuynh0 Am5tOjfNuQWuHzZ2PqLlj9AEKGmPFVWpTDXggtA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/WzRTg37GFnj5pr1nyuvUIyYjz0S/dgE3x6YXrSIpkC3a0yuti9mrBtm21VAhIeq+vhAjsmwPojKF+4O/TYLOM= X-Received: by 2002:aca:2c05:: with SMTP id s5mr29310926ois.190.1546388586669; Tue, 01 Jan 2019 16:23:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190101215007.15f15e05@leda> In-Reply-To: <20190101215007.15f15e05@leda> From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2019 01:22:55 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: binary module for arch? To: Christian Hesse Cc: WireGuard mailing list X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" Hi Christian, On Tue, Jan 1, 2019 at 9:50 PM Christian Hesse wrote: > > "Jason A. Donenfeld" on Mon, 2018/12/31 01:58: > > Hey Christian, > > > > I noticed there are now two distro-built packages for wireguard for > > arch -- wireguard-lts and wireguard-arch. These seem probably more > > convenient for most people than the dkms one. What would you recommend > > in terms of updating wireguard.com/install/ ? And do you plan on > > depreciating the dkms one at some point, or do you think it will > > remain useful for certain users? > some people gave their legit reasons to keep wireguard-dkms. I have to add > another one: It is a build-dependency for the binary modules packages. So it > will stay definitely. ;) Makes sense. I was mostly wondering about that first question though: what would you recommend I put on wireguard.com/install/ for Arch users? _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard