WireGuard Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
* Wireguard-rs implementation
@ 2019-08-19 20:30 Claude Richoux
  2019-08-25 15:49 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Claude Richoux @ 2019-08-19 20:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: wireguard

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 420 bytes --]

Hi there,
I am reimplementing the noise protocol, and I decided to test against
wireguard-rs to check my KDFs. After some confusion, I noticed that the
Blake2s HMAC function is incorrect (it disagrees with pycryptodome,
openssl, and Cloudflare's BoringTun implementation). I guess I'm just
wondering what the status is on wireguard-rs? I saw it on git, so I assumed
it was working, but maybe not?
Thanks!
Claude Richoux

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 480 bytes --]

<div dir="ltr">Hi there,<div>I am reimplementing the noise protocol, and I decided to test against wireguard-rs to check my KDFs. After some confusion, I noticed that the Blake2s HMAC function is incorrect (it disagrees with pycryptodome, openssl, and Cloudflare&#39;s BoringTun implementation). I guess I&#39;m just wondering what the status is on wireguard-rs? I saw it on git, so I assumed it was working, but maybe not?</div><div>Thanks!</div><div>Claude Richoux</div></div>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 148 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Wireguard-rs implementation
  2019-08-19 20:30 Wireguard-rs implementation Claude Richoux
@ 2019-08-25 15:49 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jason A. Donenfeld @ 2019-08-25 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Claude Richoux; +Cc: WireGuard mailing list

On Sun, Aug 25, 2019 at 9:47 AM Claude Richoux <crichoux@janestreet.com> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
> I am reimplementing the noise protocol, and I decided to test against wireguard-rs to check my KDFs. After some confusion, I noticed that the Blake2s HMAC function is incorrect (it disagrees with pycryptodome, openssl, and Cloudflare's BoringTun implementation). I guess I'm just wondering what the status is on wireguard-rs? I saw it on git, so I assumed it was working, but maybe not?

Mathias is hard at work on wireguard-rs, so there are likely all sorts
of broken or unfinished things in there. The good news is that its
development finally has some great momentum. The not as good news is
that you'll have to wait a tad bit longer for it to be complete.

https://www.wireguard.com/repositories/ has the status of each of our
projects, by the way.
_______________________________________________
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, back to index

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-08-19 20:30 Wireguard-rs implementation Claude Richoux
2019-08-25 15:49 ` Jason A. Donenfeld

WireGuard Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/wireguard/0 wireguard/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 wireguard wireguard/ https://lore.kernel.org/wireguard \
		wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com zx2c4-wireguard@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index wireguard


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/com.zx2c4.lists.wireguard


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox