From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Jason@zx2c4.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 7953009a for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 02:25:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com (frisell.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.64]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 28610258 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 02:25:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 13e44fcb for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 02:24:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by frisell.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id 0eb0fe3c (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128:NO) for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2018 02:24:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f42.google.com with SMTP id k81-v6so794154oib.4 for ; Mon, 02 Jul 2018 19:31:47 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2018 04:31:36 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Android app whitelist/blacklist feature To: eric@bluelinelabs.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Cc: WireGuard mailing list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 4:27 AM Eric Kuck wrote: > > I was originally thinking the new fragment would be a per-tunnel thing (s= et when you create the tunnel or edit it), but you=E2=80=99re right - makin= g it a general setting likely makes a whole lot more sense. I can=E2=80=99t= think of any use-cases for different tunnels handling different apps. It might actually make most sense to make it a per-tunnel thing. We'd then have to introduce conf key called, "ExemptedApplications=3D" or something. Samuel - any thoughts on this?