wireguard.lists.zx2c4.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maximilian Pudelko <maximilian.pudelko@tum.de>
To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com
Subject: Poor performance under high load
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 09:49:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJ5iZ8_X4Wk1BeLxdkWYViZRN+biJ--AA2w9CojJcciW_RmrZw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hello WireGuard list,

as part of my research I (try to) evaluate the performance of
WireGuard and found a curious pattern under increasing load: Until
~0.55 Mpps WireGuard can keep up with encrypting and forwarding, but
after that the rate decreases while the CPU load keeps increasing
until all cores are 100% utilized and _no_ packets get send.

Is that expected behavior due to the unoptimized implementation that
uses a ring buffer with spinlocks? perf shows that a lot of time is
spend waiting for those locks.

Is there a simple way to get better performance? Multiple connections?

Measurement graph:
https://gist.github.com/pudelkoM/2f216e7eb820fc5dc898eaea119448e5

Test configuration for reference:

- WireGuard 0.0.20180531
- Point-to-point setup with 2 hosts
- Linux 4.4.0-78-generic
- Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v3 @ 2.40GHz
- 2x Intel XL710 NICs
- Traffic: 64 byte UDP packets, 1000 parallel flows by src port randomization


Regards
Max

             reply	other threads:[~2018-06-26  7:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-26  7:49 Maximilian Pudelko [this message]
2018-06-26 17:57 ` Poor performance under high load Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-07-02 12:22   ` Maximilian Pudelko
2018-07-09 19:23     ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2018-07-09 20:53       ` logcabin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAJ5iZ8_X4Wk1BeLxdkWYViZRN+biJ--AA2w9CojJcciW_RmrZw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=maximilian.pudelko@tum.de \
    --cc=wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).