From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1902C18DF5 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:24:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (krantz.zx2c4.com [192.95.5.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53F8B206B2 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:24:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=archlinux-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@archlinux-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="ZyhruQFK" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 53F8B206B2 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=archlinux.us Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id d90a4f6c; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:17:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 0ccec26f for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:17:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ot1-x32c.google.com (mail-ot1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32c]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id f28a4d7f for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 14:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ot1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id g27so1787992oth.6 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 06:23:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=archlinux-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=M/NzfiDt4I7soyzaUSg2lDiWgqGmlwYKoDqCC+bHf88=; b=ZyhruQFKyoaqFKWSgIEIJGyl5PbnGgc3l1kwdXVTb/W5ZL0DMhtjL7mCwdG/P/Z+PN gRVJ/EHPzOHV94V7qN3CmLnKVXNcJJO2pXlBzA6e5Cb7zhDFZQbv2xyXis3y/NDxcOz4 y2chCCwSKKQZozFdKE5J25OaEmaIDM+aODS6sEikrxnSP6Djj0Qr6gHcS+bll0wU8BVp HqnvcIoJRptD7J+dor9JJ8DfP4iMvuN7Zav3eFzC5A7stbDMhnn0RxCYt5StXBEmjTOF KU+N/+f8FFI7nizZ9SyTgXu57ZUW4XjyjiOg9rg/YmJ1P3gacoPXbLBMi6nsLFecLdjg 7gPA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=M/NzfiDt4I7soyzaUSg2lDiWgqGmlwYKoDqCC+bHf88=; b=cQUn2g3/vEgr+Pmb2XzyZuo4CXkAyH1zNxdjy36AO7FJB0rX3p8VivptRTQ66FWIxi JBqCAi2kZAAR542oPiQ+N6GmJKEK0rW/ndoPw1AbmG+c8q0wSsFcFEqv0Ro6KT7TdG9f SqoX83fDsu7AlZLYSEMnbb4ekf8n9uE4PnwmDItTP0n2jncP1fPgQVoyxswo1rA09tmB x8NHuRhcVsRi2mZZH8H9kdF7rD/aYDBm8/GXSX9lQ/UarcXakWfucAakl3HhnzqXME17 KQz647yOWYp917bnqGbdnm+rqJDlIZJdPOoHUYhvCYU97vy23l39rnyfZ/vtIwGep5uw zf1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWbpAFl4YlI8fRS0q3c7IKlR3VfzUWthupqAh55uVpviaAIfulGc sIW1cqR6+psqFvzMiCmxGdVUGwjB8I/fOP0AkdKUt0Nz X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/VBlGdcdyq2O9hYGnyWfvqI8nr/2+UaXtRmJsxz2YgideyQ7+g/F9KG/gWwABOJke/bvhxbPo7q6SdM68ab/1M= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:245:: with SMTP id 63mr1218806otb.135.1542723838582; Tue, 20 Nov 2018 06:23:58 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <020DC45A-7CA9-49E5-9A14-6300306F5476@lonnie.abelbeck.com> In-Reply-To: <020DC45A-7CA9-49E5-9A14-6300306F5476@lonnie.abelbeck.com> From: John Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 09:23:47 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Seeking suggestions for a WG port to use with restrictive public wifi networks To: lists@lonnie.abelbeck.com Cc: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" Good call on these ports, Lonnie. I am able use use either 500 or 4500 get WireGuard connectivity on my public WiFis. I also tested 4433 and 1701 (suggested by others in reply to my query) but got a mixed result with some networks allowing traffic on them and others not. On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 3:53 PM Lonnie Abelbeck wrote: > > > > On Nov 19, 2018, at 2:33 PM, John wrote: > > > > Should I stick with the "standard" udp service ports for my > > trial-and-error based approach? Wikipedia has an article that lists > > many of these (List_of_TCP_and_UDP_port_numbers). Any suggestions are > > welcomed. > > Possibly: UDP/500 (IPSec IKE) or UDP/4500 (IPSec NAT-T) > > > Lonnie > _______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard