From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A08C432BE for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 17:30:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.zx2c4.com (lists.zx2c4.com [165.227.139.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A03EF60F56 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 17:30:47 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org A03EF60F56 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=reject dis=none) header.from=tootai.net Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.zx2c4.com Received: by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id d1237cc9; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 17:28:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail1.tootai.net ( [2a01:4f8:a0:821b::58:14]) by lists.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 769deb39 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 17:28:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail1.tootai.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.tootai.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634D360818A8 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 19:28:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=tootai.net; s=mail; t=1630344492; bh=0ZhyKDfHuyAjY73ZMsxEPGcM/aXRIUmpjIfmeb4d7Tc=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=jxsFc4ZJVe+dmIKlV0OTRlwJNRMHwUYz+aojgKeBLJUc0u1ndksa9tc1OarY8WK7f 2NLcEt5yYeQKD07TMw2AvCqPd89sj0yrerRPhqH/vse9qhXjDYvSsUtkiWl1L0syW8 9YVzG6ERc4UJiatU1v2q/oHsn/zO5K1Mc0DEHPYo= Received: from [IPv6:2a01:729:16e:10::24] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:729:16e:10::24]) by mail1.tootai.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3834A6081880 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 19:28:12 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=tootai.net; s=mail; t=1630344492; bh=0ZhyKDfHuyAjY73ZMsxEPGcM/aXRIUmpjIfmeb4d7Tc=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=jxsFc4ZJVe+dmIKlV0OTRlwJNRMHwUYz+aojgKeBLJUc0u1ndksa9tc1OarY8WK7f 2NLcEt5yYeQKD07TMw2AvCqPd89sj0yrerRPhqH/vse9qhXjDYvSsUtkiWl1L0syW8 9YVzG6ERc4UJiatU1v2q/oHsn/zO5K1Mc0DEHPYo= Subject: Re: [Warning: DMARC Fail Email] Re: ipv6 connexion fail - ipv4 OK To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com References: <20210827211412.3ed5f170@natsu> <3ec547c6-c846-e5be-e276-ace7862f5cb7@tootai.net> <34d4341c-98be-b754-af8e-c7097bc21aac@pineview.net> <20210828024454.1766744f@natsu> <7437f3e0-26ba-5e33-a175-0cf233635b3f@tootai.net> <20210830214312.6a332333@natsu> From: Daniel Message-ID: Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 19:28:11 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210830214312.6a332333@natsu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: fr-FR X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-BeenThere: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30rc1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: wireguard-bounces@lists.zx2c4.com Sender: "WireGuard" Le 30/08/2021 à 18:43, Roman Mamedov a écrit : > On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 12:24:01 +0200 > Daniel wrote: > >> Using tcpdump -i any I see the trafic coming to the gre interface and >> that's all. But netstat show >> >> udp6       0      0 :::12345 :::* >> 0          125391     - >> >> and ps aux output is >> >> dh@peech:~$ ps ax|grep wg >>    6969 ?        I<     0:00 [wg-crypt-wig4to] >>    7026 ?        I      0:00 [kworker/1:2-wg-kex-wig4tootai] >> >> Question: is wireguard really listening on all ipv6 addresses ? If not, >> how is the address choosen ? > Yes it does. > > > You seem to have some very complex setup, I suggest to look into whether you > send replies from the interface you expect them to. If you use wg-quick, maybe > switch to just wg and set up manually and with careful intent of each action, > as wg-quick might not have in mind some aspect of your setup. I don't use wg-quick: interface setup is done in interfaces file and reading conf file from there. To be sure (and I think it is as I have no problem with ipv4): . my interfaces are named wig4tootai our wigserver Nothing wrong here ? . conf file are not named .conf but server.conf or anyname.conf Nothing wrong here too ? Conserning the setup, I made another one using one VPS (one public ipv4 and one ipv6 /64 range) but get the same result. No FW involved at all :( -- Daniel