From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: matthias@urlichs.de Received: from krantz.zx2c4.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id 300a8780 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 14:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from netz.smurf.noris.de (2001:780:107:8:83:: [IPv6:2001:780:107:8:83::]) by krantz.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTP id fce86248 for ; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 14:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [2001:780:107:0:1278:d2ff:fea3:d4a6] by mail.vm.smurf.noris.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1fuIvf-000FdU-DP for wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 16:55:43 +0200 Subject: Re: Getting IPv6 route advertisements to work over WG To: wireguard@lists.zx2c4.com References: <20180827171426.7c4ec614@natsu> <8c7ad33a-b1bc-1993-e442-836230f4bf37@gmail.com> <20180827185329.1a7bb24a@natsu> From: Matthias Urlichs Message-ID: Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 16:55:41 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-Id: Development discussion of WireGuard List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 27.08.2018 16:46, Riccardo Paolo Bestetti wrote: > The tunnel could be initially established with no tunnel addresses, It could also be initially established with one non-forwarded tunnel address, allowing you to converse through the tunnel with standard tools, and without adding unnecessary complexity to WG. Also, keep in mind that you need an initial off-link transaction anyway, to exchange public keys. You can exchange whatever else needs exchanging at the same time. -- -- Matthias Urlichs