From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C498CA9EBC for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 14:50:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7FB21929 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 14:50:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="V5Rhzrds" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2394054AbfJYOug (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 10:50:36 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f65.google.com ([209.85.167.65]:37110 "EHLO mail-lf1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389921AbfJYOug (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 10:50:36 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f65.google.com with SMTP id b20so2003429lfp.4; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:50:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=GP25gDaBM4nvH/8ZwVG/JMPU5nGGHBh6V9T7g5JlEf8=; b=V5RhzrdsBmvh7t+Lw3dEYEjPGqnkfoF8W5qpFbRGkk67GDJTN4hYuFXuih1Aso9ZdS 1Vs2l735wMRiT1JBJoECWpYDx5dMh8Kg6ZFn1i2YsWivnCQDFcMfVL0xu1TDrt2x4CuJ OvwclkxSNLpFQHjIP5WnLwJwdD35AXyuA+qGzFKXNA9A2NZV8URZjicGCcbM6BAZAdzH eCkxvIqYXK4+DC+u2nqe/FIU738JsEQDqjEwRuwhOczKh38uykDh7rDrLsjtO6LAhKFY YE+SodDfDnILZIi/HUgSF/6WDVXXYazRx/vEj3BaNJ+hoWteVv+Mnx5S9yYNsVM7lfso U21w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=GP25gDaBM4nvH/8ZwVG/JMPU5nGGHBh6V9T7g5JlEf8=; b=WVT9Jb9ufERWN+NO8dKHwywDPVBiG6JlNrC8aVxscH0etgoppDyCQGa/Q6UJzaX3Sk BB7slgRPYuf45OqOyUwaxG7ZUq1sxbiVqIOWcTI9cznecG5fkUIMjT/XIK4PehledC4g PEv6R6E2kwdgPs2ad5nSlI2dkWaGbCD3U8CZBXL76EMDH0ONRv/TFxvsImtW3/7/uayu 7KBP+ANWzPc6S1+2l5OOHwEg7P0NtGcc7sFlh+AawexNQIiJdXm+hErHpLvuRhd89Z6x cw8UxJtGJcIsw9tollmji9MbrbHuGJsifONziL7QMzhCSgXBi4JfsBB54XrIptsoTEnM BK9A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXx/RnVCOCkxtFKvLSGPX+cSWzn1hKCPUyWtiAtVDMHqW+JUYBQ g4l4TnqePe4CJrhiuQjFFo5obbx9vI0T7oCcj+9ntpNQ X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqweVC7SuoIPkuFuFnyrzGyBmzpbSNif5nmyBc2tAA6rCO7iDh9wufyw0RDlqLaNOE9/EGbMQIYncmMzGbvGd2M= X-Received: by 2002:a19:3845:: with SMTP id d5mr2907586lfj.162.1572015033388; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:50:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:50:22 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: patch review delays To: bpf , Network Development , Daniel Borkmann , "David S. Miller" , Konstantin Ryabitsev , workflows@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: workflows-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org The last few days I've experienced long email delivery when I was not directly cc-ed on patches. Even right now I see some patches in patchworks, but not in my inbox. Few folks reported similar issues. In order for everyone to review the submissions appropriately I'll be applying only the most obvious patches and will let others sit in the patchworks a bit longer than usual. Sorry about that. Ironic that I'm using email to talk about email delays. My understanding that these delays are not vger's fault. Some remediations may be used sporadically, but we need to accelerate our search of long term solutions. I think Daniel's l2md: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dborkman/l2md.git/ is a great solution. It's on my todo list to give it a try, but I'm not sure how practical for every patch reviewer on this list to switch to that model. Thoughts?