From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA0BC433E0 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 17:49:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C1CE20771 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 17:49:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="bFwUJoIw" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729700AbgGMRte (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 13:49:34 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:60714 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729681AbgGMRtd (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 13:49:33 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x741.google.com (mail-qk1-x741.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::741]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91888C061755 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:49:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk1-x741.google.com with SMTP id k18so13070189qke.4 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:49:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BkAx4te/t2dP0CHkl/ckW6vk0ixaMlM/BCr6OR+PoqE=; b=bFwUJoIw6L4+/hxp2Z2pdqws9l+yh2KoPi+XokfVKLFcDunOcqGaNPbfLOqR5KYp/g AjrTRqasUH2zkdNpbpN3axG8nVau4kn8Ejni/5A2D/hcss/WXvnjxaKR0ZS7fv/E4rcv 9AC+G59tL+ctT/KpvgVJdv4/8WgC6FcZaTdSXcVSLKf1dIjSR7b3FgMCb7Vpqy2muLDA h6U/0HE6NUDkBaUonoBLW/HlOr0vfotzYXyL6wOqF4OFbLcXHMm8vHfXYoBsF+Jf6y8Q SdmjvJobJBJMFtv/SNood4m3SUQeyBaFcEHWmSvgdkgCizcooCOKrOH6DjCxFNoT/rMt qAUA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=BkAx4te/t2dP0CHkl/ckW6vk0ixaMlM/BCr6OR+PoqE=; b=ErJXU8DxeH6r5x1YikIbZuePXO3cW4VpbXyuTFWeV3l4sYoUttGFsaMNmzDB9bzMRQ beU913XwKoOu7bjIPTe9z1JKa7IlXkRRbmdYsa91vwOa8zz7gQKzrz/qZTyT1uXyl6q2 qwH1m7TK+vFWk2dJ5YYhL9LpwZvf62AkWJHS1bSCgwsZfvUy2vEjwi0FSvXb9us1lrag 6g3k+qWpp4s9yaNJmvpjnsAV5eUbI1kyqLs9vT+pyhqMG90abyPilFCHrlC26c1E+BTS VSrkxAJkzk6/FMWV3ELlRa/EFPb0rqCBrCCC0Z2qP/9YO5vhQPaTPeaQtQ+UrLN5UiMp YjXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533WP+luahqorPsAN9mbbvjv80l2yQ8JYqL2/oFnKiAYCeIQ52oK 03EPWbSB46IFuqV8maEeCKF6Mkvu X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxVL0IB06yfz6tICy3YQ/BtULZUJQDjsSZikcvv+dSP+HZhJNKAEVFXL6/suCQnC9PmGq58qw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:a56:: with SMTP id j22mr753062qka.193.1594662572411; Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:49:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.46] (c-73-88-245-53.hsd1.tn.comcast.net. [73.88.245.53]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a5sm20012752qtd.84.2020.07.13.10.49.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 13 Jul 2020 10:49:31 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: KernelCI Community Survey To: Guillaume Tucker , kernelci@groups.io, automated-testing@lists.yoctoproject.org, kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org References: <4e70209b-e637-abdf-d72a-7cb978956f9d@collabora.com> From: Frank Rowand Message-ID: Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2020 12:49:30 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: workflows-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: workflows@vger.kernel.org On 2020-07-09 17:32, Guillaume Tucker wrote: > On 11/06/2020 11:11, Guillaume Tucker wrote: >> + workflows >> >> On 02/06/2020 22:22, Guillaume Tucker wrote: >>> As the KernelCI project keeps growing, we need to know a bit >>> better what the Linux kernel community needs in terms of >>> automated testing. We would really appreciate if you could >>> please spare one minute to fill this survey form: >> >> Sending out a big Thank You for all the replies we have received >> already, your input is proving to be highly valuable. We thought >> it would also be relevant to share this on the workflows mailing >> list and reach a slightly broader audience while the survey is >> still open. >> >>> https://forms.gle/Y5iuyLXgQr2y3SrF6 >> >> Please feel free to fill the form if you haven't done so already >> and share the link above with others you think might be >> interested. > > Thanks again everyone who has responded to the survey. Here's > the detailed report which also includes a spreadsheet with the > full results (minus any personal information): > > https://foundation.kernelci.org/blog/2020/07/09/kernelci-community-survey-report/ > > Please also note that we've decided to re-open the form until the > end of August, in case some of you missed the opportunity to > respond before. The link is the same as in my previous email: > > https://forms.gle/Y5iuyLXgQr2y3SrF6 > > Best wishes, > Guillaume > Some feedback from my experience answering the survey today. Question "Would a web-based dashboard fit well within your workflow?" had two answers. The answers to choose from made assumptions about why one would choose "yes" or "no". The second answer is "No thanks, I only want to work with emails and command line tools." The second answer does not allow me say that I have a preference for emails and command line tools, but I find a web based interface to also provide value. It would be better to split the original question into two questions: (1) web-based dashboard useful? (yes/no) (2) emails and command line tools useful? (yes/no) And it would probably be even better to split (2) into (2) emails, and (3) command line tools. I wanted to answer yes to each of them, but if only one was available then I had a preference, which is what my answer was based on. Then the question "Would you want to be able to access an API with raw test data?" again put intent into the "no" answer. The answers should have been (1) yes (2) no If you wanted to explore further, a second question would be: "Do I want to design my own CI tools that access the raw test data via an API?".