From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853EFC43331 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:59:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59A6920714 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:59:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="K1WglUZ6" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 59A6920714 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jH3kn-00063k-Dt; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:59:21 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jH3km-00063f-IO for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:59:20 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: ad3cedb4-6e87-11ea-b34e-bc764e2007e4 Received: from mail-ed1-x541.google.com (unknown [2a00:1450:4864:20::541]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id ad3cedb4-6e87-11ea-b34e-bc764e2007e4; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:59:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-x541.google.com with SMTP id de14so1782031edb.4 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 03:59:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:reply-to:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :thread-index; bh=bU2Ct0niDTHtWdJ+4wnqlO1P+0vpmPlXj50bcwjZAj4=; b=K1WglUZ6muJ0ce0OXre9FDyLD8kWZ4Hf3NzzfnFTXToIziiDdGEqCdjEHRyUj4Ucyt D8MPHNXt1SnWGrHNacjhmTUgJwCkcg1Ig1XuRzwHKxDegBuOaA9l4FmVsuDFAmFxm1Yj G7vUlSgviyPiy5RfDzk+fiVxY4iMLWUvuzMDCw3Zc2GxR4POG7uYkdIB1UEHq7fYwakf ZVJ1mqyVYswSY/mc1ts1lhLWSye/HHKTPO4hJKP1ImvgrGINDaiKkWntmgBWtG/tlCck E8l3btdPZo51yAykoOpfb2YzCyO9HbzXQ2BFbx5046IFJDIoqA7SMVybpQH4uam50xnH 1oHw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:reply-to:to:cc:references:in-reply-to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:thread-index; bh=bU2Ct0niDTHtWdJ+4wnqlO1P+0vpmPlXj50bcwjZAj4=; b=pdTZGiKItfniYCRqFKTeiuVl9YeTIpXXHfNvBSub7wozG/PW7bxyYCWxK5SacJvllW XC29SiubyLblMEVzTY/Ofx26LneaUMwW/9WVJpEh7wcEnVRKVfkTpq+/HlHMY2fHebhL Yutat9QxqsZfQZnLEXZ0LxnmuiVUJp+kqLcFG7PkXXUJmpF6jJVYQWDKqSy1ZID96bHF tQ++tIe+DieeRbcXFhR7yHXKKCOD2i4bwAI6sQaoxM+MPA3AgBDMoJOYPO+AgkRDHefb KuYxhMv4Lnmco3hlARgai6WzCtjapET9e+TKon6zLDMSc/kp9uSOs+ystmihgUt6mK+k cSwg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ3OUtwXuEzNXSoEUcX9neX0M9kS8km+kIkUDJ7d/gMUqZTa9mGS /UF9uNTSpww/kOQJ9wVf6l4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vtdG4h35swg1P8NMBxoaC/qVF4/iwPcJKcRl+q02MRN6bota6tcZoKE2b+YYdo5U1PaO3RaXQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:519:: with SMTP id m25mr2155889edv.302.1585133959081; Wed, 25 Mar 2020 03:59:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from CBGR90WXYV0 ([54.239.6.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b15sm1537944edn.69.2020.03.25.03.59.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 25 Mar 2020 03:59:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Paul Durrant X-Google-Original-From: "Paul Durrant" To: "'Jan Beulich'" , References: <6fa81b4d-528d-5c33-50c5-a18396b4383a@suse.com> In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:59:17 -0000 Message-ID: <00c101d60294$6e688fd0$4b39af70$@xen.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0 Content-Language: en-gb Thread-Index: AQJMIcItOEpMp4KkwcF5X4XGaZOQiwJ4Jx8+p1kjv/A= Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 00/10] x86emul: further work X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: paul@xen.org Cc: 'Andrew Cooper' , 'Wei Liu' , 'Roger Pau Monne' Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" > -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich > Sent: 24 March 2020 12:43 > To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > Cc: Andrew Cooper ; Paul Durrant ; Wei Liu ; > Roger Pau Monne > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] x86emul: further work > > Paul,On 24.03.2020 13:26, Jan Beulich wrote: > > Some of the later patches are still at least partly RFC, for > > varying reasons (see there). I'd appreciate though if at least > > some of the earlier ones could go in rather sooner than later. > > > > Patch 1 functionally (for the test harness) depends on > > "libx86/CPUID: fix (not just) leaf 7 processing", while at > > least patch 2 contextually depends on "x86emul: disable > > FPU/MMX/SIMD insn emulation when !HVM". > > > > 1: x86emul: support AVX512_BF16 insns > > I should note that I also have a VP2INTERSECT patch ready, but the > just released SDE segfaults when trying to test it. I'll be holding > this back for some more time, I guess. > > > 2: x86emul: support MOVDIRI insn > > 3: x86: determine HAVE_AS_* just once > > 4: x86: move back clang no integrated assembler tests > > 5: x86emul: support MOVDIR64B insn > > 6: x86emul: support ENQCMD insn > > 7: x86/HVM: scale MPERF values reported to guests (on AMD) > > 8: x86emul: support RDPRU > > 9: x86/HVM: don't needlessly intercept APERF/MPERF/TSC MSR reads > > 10: x86emul: support MCOMMIT > > Paul, I should also note that I mistakenly Cc-ed your old Citrix > address. I'd like to avoid re-posting the series - do you perhaps > nevertheless get the xen-devel copies? > Yeah I have them. My filters just moved them into my general 'xen' mailbox but I got them. Paul > Jan