From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
To: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: "Andrew Cooper" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"George Dunlap" <george.dunlap@citrix.com>,
"Ian Jackson" <iwj@xenproject.org>,
"Julien Grall" <julien@xen.org>,
"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
"Wei Liu" <wl@xen.org>, "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/8] assorted replacement of x[mz]alloc_bytes()
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 16:54:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <091b4b91-712f-3526-78d1-80d31faf8e41@suse.com> (raw)
In the long run I think we want to do away with these type-unsafe
interfaces, the more that they also request (typically) excess
alignment. This series of entirely independent patches is
eliminating the instances where it's relatively clear that they're
not just "blob" allocations.
v2 only has commit messages extended.
1: x86/MCE: avoid effectively open-coding xmalloc_array()
2: x86/HVM: avoid effectively open-coding xmalloc_array()
3: x86/oprofile: avoid effectively open-coding xmalloc_array()
4: x86/IRQ: avoid over-alignment in alloc_pirq_struct()
5: EFI/runtime: avoid effectively open-coding xmalloc_array()
6: kexec: avoid effectively open-coding xzalloc_flex_struct()
7: video/lfb: avoid effectively open-coding xzalloc_array()
8: Arm/optee: don't open-code xzalloc_flex_struct()
Jan
next reply other threads:[~2021-04-21 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-21 14:54 Jan Beulich [this message]
2021-04-21 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] x86/MCE: avoid effectively open-coding xmalloc_array() Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] x86/HVM: " Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] x86/oprofile: " Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 14:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] x86/IRQ: avoid over-alignment in alloc_pirq_struct() Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] EFI/runtime: avoid effectively open-coding x{m,z}alloc_array() Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 14:58 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] kexec: avoid effectively open-coding xzalloc_flex_struct() Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] video/lfb: avoid effectively open-coding xzalloc_array() Jan Beulich
2021-04-21 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] Arm/optee: don't open-code xzalloc_flex_struct() Jan Beulich
2021-05-03 13:53 ` Ping: " Jan Beulich
2021-05-04 23:49 ` Volodymyr Babchuk
2021-04-21 15:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] assorted replacement of x[mz]alloc_bytes() Andrew Cooper
2021-04-21 15:32 ` Jan Beulich
2021-04-23 9:44 ` Jan Beulich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=091b4b91-712f-3526-78d1-80d31faf8e41@suse.com \
--to=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=george.dunlap@citrix.com \
--cc=iwj@xenproject.org \
--cc=julien@xen.org \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=wl@xen.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).