Xen-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
* [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] x86: S3 resume adjustments
@ 2019-06-14 11:30 Jan Beulich
  2019-06-14 11:37 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] x86/ACPI: re-park previously parked CPUs upon resume from S3 Jan Beulich
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2019-06-14 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel; +Cc: George Dunlap, Andrew Cooper, Wei Liu, Roger Pau Monne

1: x86/ACPI: re-park previously parked CPUs upon resume from S3
2: x86/ACPI: restore VESA mode upon resume from S3
3: x86: a little bit of 16-bit video mode setting code cleanup

Patch 2 is meant to address an issue I've observed while testing
patch 1, and patch 3 is simply a collection a misc changes noticed
while putting together patch 2 as possibly worthwhile to make.

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] x86/ACPI: re-park previously parked CPUs upon resume from S3
  2019-06-14 11:30 [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] x86: S3 resume adjustments Jan Beulich
@ 2019-06-14 11:37 ` Jan Beulich
  2019-06-14 16:52   ` Julien Grall
  2019-06-14 11:37 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/3] x86/ACPI: restore VESA mode " Jan Beulich
  2019-06-14 11:38 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] x86: a little bit of 16-bit video mode setting code cleanup Jan Beulich
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2019-06-14 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel
  Cc: Stefano Stabellini, Wei Liu, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk,
	George Dunlap, Andrew Cooper, Ian Jackson, Tim Deegan,
	Julien Grall

Aiui when resuming from S3, CPUs come back out of RESET/INIT. Therefore
they need to undergo the same procedure as was added elsewhere by
commits d8f974f1a6 ("x86: command line option to avoid use of secondary
hyper-threads") and 8797d20a6e ("x86: possibly bring up all CPUs even
if not all are supposed to be used").

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

--- a/xen/common/cpu.c
+++ b/xen/common/cpu.c
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ int cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
     if ( err )
         goto fail;
 
-    if ( unlikely(system_state < SYS_STATE_active) )
+    if ( system_state < SYS_STATE_active || system_state == SYS_STATE_resume )
         on_selected_cpus(cpumask_of(cpu), _take_cpu_down, NULL, true);
     else if ( (err = stop_machine_run(take_cpu_down, NULL, cpu)) < 0 )
         goto fail;
@@ -207,15 +207,19 @@ void enable_nonboot_cpus(void)
 
     printk("Enabling non-boot CPUs  ...\n");
 
-    for_each_cpu ( cpu, &frozen_cpus )
+    for_each_present_cpu ( cpu )
     {
+        if ( park_offline_cpus ? cpu == smp_processor_id()
+                               : !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &frozen_cpus) )
+            continue;
         if ( (error = cpu_up(cpu)) )
         {
             printk("Error bringing CPU%d up: %d\n", cpu, error);
             BUG_ON(error == -EBUSY);
         }
-        else
-            __cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &frozen_cpus);
+        else if ( !__cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &frozen_cpus) &&
+                  (error = cpu_down(cpu)) )
+            printk("Error re-offlining CPU%d: %d\n", cpu, error);
     }
 
     for_each_cpu ( cpu, &frozen_cpus )





_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/3] x86/ACPI: restore VESA mode upon resume from S3
  2019-06-14 11:30 [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] x86: S3 resume adjustments Jan Beulich
  2019-06-14 11:37 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] x86/ACPI: re-park previously parked CPUs upon resume from S3 Jan Beulich
@ 2019-06-14 11:37 ` " Jan Beulich
  2019-06-14 11:38 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] x86: a little bit of 16-bit video mode setting code cleanup Jan Beulich
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2019-06-14 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel; +Cc: George Dunlap, Andrew Cooper, WeiLiu, Roger Pau Monne

In order for "acpi_sleep=s3_mode" to have any effect, we should record
the video mode we switched to during boot. Since right now there's mode
setting code for VESA modes only in the resume case, record the mode
just in that one case.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
---
RFC: On the box that I've been trying to test this on this didn't really
     make a difference (in the random cases where resume works in the
     first place there): The graphics card looks to remain powered off
     even after the Dom0 kernel has resumed. Additionally using
     "acpi_sleep=s3_bios" didn't make a difference either. Furthermore
     it looks like the serial console (connected via PCI card) doesn't
     work (yet) immediately after resume (I suppose it too is powered
     down), and resume hangs altogether with it in use. Hence it's sort
     of difficult to actually debug anything here.
---
I'm wondering actually whether the user having to explicitly request the
mode restoration is a good model: Why would we _not_ want to restore the
mode we've set during boot? In the worst case Dom0 kernel or X will
change the mode another time.

--- a/xen/arch/x86/boot/video.S
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/boot/video.S
@@ -455,14 +455,17 @@ check_vesa:
         cmpb    $0x99, %al
         jnz     _setbad                 # Doh! No linear frame buffer.
 
+        pushw   %bx
         subb    $VIDEO_FIRST_VESA>>8, %bh
         orw     $0x4000, %bx            # Use linear frame buffer
         movw    $0x4f02, %ax            # VESA BIOS mode set call
         int     $0x10
+        popw    %bx
         cmpw    $0x004f, %ax            # AL=4f if implemented
         jnz     _setbad                 # AH=0 if OK
 
         movb    $1, bootsym(graphic_mode)  # flag graphic mode
+        movw    %bx, bootsym(video_mode)
         stc
         ret
 





_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] x86: a little bit of 16-bit video mode setting code cleanup
  2019-06-14 11:30 [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] x86: S3 resume adjustments Jan Beulich
  2019-06-14 11:37 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] x86/ACPI: re-park previously parked CPUs upon resume from S3 Jan Beulich
  2019-06-14 11:37 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/3] x86/ACPI: restore VESA mode " Jan Beulich
@ 2019-06-14 11:38 ` Jan Beulich
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2019-06-14 11:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: xen-devel; +Cc: George Dunlap, Andrew Cooper, WeiLiu, Roger Pau Monne

To "compensate" for the code size growth by an earlier change:
- drop "trampoline" labels (in almost all cases the target label is
  reachable with an 8-bit-displacement branch anyway, and a single 16-
  bit-displacement branch is still better than a pair of two branches)
- drop an entirely dead insn
- reduce code size in a few other (obvious I hope) cases, by more
  suitable insn/operands selection

Also drop redundant #define-s (move suitable #include a little earlier
instead) and add two alignment directives.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>

--- a/xen/arch/x86/boot/trampoline.S
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/boot/trampoline.S
@@ -176,6 +176,7 @@ start64:
 
         jmpq    *%rdi
 
+#include "video.h"
 #include "wakeup.S"
 
         .balign 8
@@ -283,8 +284,6 @@ trampoline_boot_cpu_entry:
         /* Jump to the common bootstrap entry point. */
         jmp     trampoline_protmode_entry
 
-#include "video.h"
-
         .align  2
 /* Keep in sync with cmdline.c:early_boot_opts_t type! */
 early_boot_opts:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/boot/video.S
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/boot/video.S
@@ -384,9 +384,6 @@ lmbad:  leaw    bootsym(unknt), %si
         jmp     mode_menu
 lmdef:  ret
 
-_setrec:    jmp setrec                  # Ugly...
-_set_80x25: jmp set_80x25
-
 # Setting of user mode (AX=mode ID) => CF=success
 mode_set:
         movw    %ax, bootsym(boot_vid_mode)
@@ -396,7 +393,7 @@ mode_set:
         je      setvesabysize
 
         testb   $VIDEO_RECALC>>8, %ah
-        jnz     _setrec
+        jnz     setrec
 
         cmpb    $VIDEO_FIRST_SPECIAL>>8, %ah
         jz      setspc
@@ -421,7 +418,7 @@ setspc: xorb    %bh, %bh
 
 setmenu:
         orb     %al, %al                # 80x25 is an exception
-        jz      _set_80x25
+        jz      set_80x25
         
         pushw   %bx                     # Set mode chosen from menu
         call    mode_table              # Build the mode table
@@ -441,36 +438,32 @@ check_vesa:
         cmpw    $0x004f, %ax
         jnz     setbad
 
-        leaw    vesa_mode_info, %di
-        subb    $VIDEO_FIRST_VESA>>8, %bh
-        movw    %bx, %cx                # Get mode information structure
+        leaw    vesa_mode_info, %di     # Get mode information structure
+        leaw    -VIDEO_FIRST_VESA(%bx), %cx
         movw    $0x4f01, %ax
         int     $0x10
-        addb    $VIDEO_FIRST_VESA>>8, %bh
         cmpw    $0x004f, %ax
         jnz     setbad
 
         movb    (%di), %al              # Check mode attributes.
         andb    $0x99, %al
         cmpb    $0x99, %al
-        jnz     _setbad                 # Doh! No linear frame buffer.
+        jnz     setbad                  # Doh! No linear frame buffer.
 
         pushw   %bx
         subb    $VIDEO_FIRST_VESA>>8, %bh
-        orw     $0x4000, %bx            # Use linear frame buffer
+        orb     $0x40, %bh              # Use linear frame buffer
         movw    $0x4f02, %ax            # VESA BIOS mode set call
         int     $0x10
         popw    %bx
         cmpw    $0x004f, %ax            # AL=4f if implemented
-        jnz     _setbad                 # AH=0 if OK
+        jnz     setbad                  # AH=0 if OK
 
         movb    $1, bootsym(graphic_mode)  # flag graphic mode
         movw    %bx, bootsym(video_mode)
         stc
         ret
 
-_setbad: jmp    setbad                  # Ugly...
-
 # Recalculate vertical display end registers -- this fixes various
 # inconsistencies of extended modes on many adapters. Called when
 # the VIDEO_RECALC flag is set in the mode ID.
@@ -515,7 +508,7 @@ setvesabysize:
         leaw    modelist,%si
 1:      add     $8,%si
         cmpw    $ASK_VGA,-8(%si)        # End?
-        je      _setbad
+        je      setbad
         movw    -6(%si),%ax
         cmpw    %ax,bootsym(vesa_size)+0
         jne     1b
@@ -948,6 +941,7 @@ store_edid:
 #endif
         ret
 
+                .p2align 1
 mt_end:         .word   0       # End of video mode table if built
 edit_buf:       .space  6       # Line editor buffer
 card_name:      .word   0       # Pointer to adapter name
@@ -991,6 +985,7 @@ vesa_name:      .asciz  "VESA"
 
 name_bann:      .asciz  "Video adapter: "
 
+                .p2align 1
 force_size:     .word   0       # Use this size instead of the one in BIOS vars
 
 GLOBAL(boot_vid_info)
--- a/xen/arch/x86/boot/wakeup.S
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/boot/wakeup.S
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ ENTRY(wakeup_start)
         jne     bogus_real_magic
 
         # for acpi_sleep=s3_bios
-        testl   $1, wakesym(video_flags)
+        testb   $1, wakesym(video_flags)
         jz      1f
         lcall   $0xc000, $3
         movw    %cs, %ax        # In case messed by BIOS
@@ -38,9 +38,9 @@ ENTRY(wakeup_start)
         movw    %ax, %ss        # Need this? How to ret if clobbered?
 
 1:      # for acpi_sleep=s3_mode
-        testl   $2, wakesym(video_flags)
+        testb   $2, wakesym(video_flags)
         jz      1f
-        movl    wakesym(video_mode), %eax
+        movw    wakesym(video_mode), %ax
         call    mode_setw
 
 1:      # Show some progress if VGA is resumed
@@ -55,48 +55,26 @@ ENTRY(wakeup_start)
         lmsw    %ax             # Turn on CR0.PE 
         ljmpl   $BOOT_CS32, $bootsym_rel(wakeup_32, 6)
 
-/* This code uses an extended set of video mode numbers. These include:
- * Aliases for standard modes
- *      NORMAL_VGA (-1)
- *      EXTENDED_VGA (-2)
- *      ASK_VGA (-3)
- * Video modes numbered by menu position -- NOT RECOMMENDED because of lack
- * of compatibility when extending the table. These are between 0x00 and 0xff.
- */
-#define VIDEO_FIRST_MENU 0x0000
-
-/* Standard BIOS video modes (BIOS number + 0x0100) */
-#define VIDEO_FIRST_BIOS 0x0100
-
-/* VESA BIOS video modes (VESA number + 0x0200) */
-#define VIDEO_FIRST_VESA 0x0200
-
-/* Video7 special modes (BIOS number + 0x0900) */
-#define VIDEO_FIRST_V7 0x0900
-
 # Setting of user mode (AX=mode ID) => CF=success
 mode_setw:
         movw    %ax, %bx
         cmpb    $VIDEO_FIRST_VESA>>8, %ah
         jnc     check_vesaw
-        decb    %ah
 
 setbadw: clc
         ret
 
 check_vesaw:
         subb    $VIDEO_FIRST_VESA>>8, %bh
-        orw     $0x4000, %bx                    # Use linear frame buffer
+        orb     $0x40, %bh                      # Use linear frame buffer
         movw    $0x4f02, %ax                    # VESA BIOS mode set call
         int     $0x10
         cmpw    $0x004f, %ax                    # AL=4f if implemented
-        jnz     _setbadw                        # AH=0 if OK
+        jnz     setbadw                         # AH=0 if OK
 
         stc
         ret
 
-_setbadw: jmp    setbadw
-
 bogus_real_magic:
         movw    $0x0e00 + 'B', %fs:(0x12)
         jmp     bogus_real_magic




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] x86/ACPI: re-park previously parked CPUs upon resume from S3
  2019-06-14 11:37 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] x86/ACPI: re-park previously parked CPUs upon resume from S3 Jan Beulich
@ 2019-06-14 16:52   ` Julien Grall
  2019-06-17  6:40     ` Jan Beulich
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Julien Grall @ 2019-06-14 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Beulich, xen-devel
  Cc: Stefano Stabellini, Wei Liu, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk,
	George Dunlap, Andrew Cooper, Tim Deegan, Ian Jackson

Hi Jan,

The title and commit message are a bit odd to read because you are modifying 
common code but everything is geared towards x86.

On 14/06/2019 12:37, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Aiui when resuming from S3, CPUs come back out of RESET/INIT. Therefore
> they need to undergo the same procedure as was added elsewhere by
> commits d8f974f1a6 ("x86: command line option to avoid use of secondary
> hyper-threads") and 8797d20a6e ("x86: possibly bring up all CPUs even
> if not all are supposed to be used").
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> 
> --- a/xen/common/cpu.c
> +++ b/xen/common/cpu.c
> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ int cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
>       if ( err )
>           goto fail;
>   
> -    if ( unlikely(system_state < SYS_STATE_active) )
> +    if ( system_state < SYS_STATE_active || system_state == SYS_STATE_resume )

So this change here is necessary because enable_nonboot_cpus() may call 
cpu_down(), am I right? If so, could you please mention it in the commit message?

>           on_selected_cpus(cpumask_of(cpu), _take_cpu_down, NULL, true);
>       else if ( (err = stop_machine_run(take_cpu_down, NULL, cpu)) < 0 )
>           goto fail;
> @@ -207,15 +207,19 @@ void enable_nonboot_cpus(void)
>   
>       printk("Enabling non-boot CPUs  ...\n");
>   
> -    for_each_cpu ( cpu, &frozen_cpus )
> +    for_each_present_cpu ( cpu )
>       {
> +        if ( park_offline_cpus ? cpu == smp_processor_id()

park_offline_cpus is x86 specific, so it will not build on Arm.

> +                               : !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &frozen_cpus) )
> +            continue;
>           if ( (error = cpu_up(cpu)) )
>           {
>               printk("Error bringing CPU%d up: %d\n", cpu, error);
>               BUG_ON(error == -EBUSY);
>           }
> -        else
> -            __cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, &frozen_cpus);
> +        else if ( !__cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &frozen_cpus) &&
> +                  (error = cpu_down(cpu)) )
> +            printk("Error re-offlining CPU%d: %d\n", cpu, error);
>       }
>   
>       for_each_cpu ( cpu, &frozen_cpus )

Cheers,

-- 
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] x86/ACPI: re-park previously parked CPUs upon resume from S3
  2019-06-14 16:52   ` Julien Grall
@ 2019-06-17  6:40     ` Jan Beulich
  2019-06-17  8:12       ` Julien Grall
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Jan Beulich @ 2019-06-17  6:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Julien Grall
  Cc: Stefano Stabellini, WeiLiu, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, George Dunlap,
	Andrew Cooper, Ian Jackson, Tim Deegan, xen-devel

>>> On 14.06.19 at 18:52, <julien.grall@arm.com> wrote:
> The title and commit message are a bit odd to read because you are modifying 
> common code but everything is geared towards x86.

Indeed. There's no caller of {en,dis}able_nonboot_cpus() in Arm code
at present, afaics. Hence the code changed (but not the file) is truly
x86-specific at the moment. I've explicitly thought about the
"inconsistency" between title and contents, but I've deliberately put it
as is: The change _is_ x86 / ACPI only, _despite_ touching common
code (and hence needing a REST maintainer ack).

>> --- a/xen/common/cpu.c
>> +++ b/xen/common/cpu.c
>> @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ int cpu_down(unsigned int cpu)
>>       if ( err )
>>           goto fail;
>>   
>> -    if ( unlikely(system_state < SYS_STATE_active) )
>> +    if ( system_state < SYS_STATE_active || system_state == SYS_STATE_resume )
> 
> So this change here is necessary because enable_nonboot_cpus() may call 
> cpu_down(), am I right?

Yes (albeit likely s/necessary/wanted/).

> If so, could you please mention it in the commit message?

Hmm, I could. But this is just paralleling what we're already doing for
the boot path, so it didn't seem imperative to me to call it out. But
anyway, I've added a sentence.

>> @@ -207,15 +207,19 @@ void enable_nonboot_cpus(void)
>>   
>>       printk("Enabling non-boot CPUs  ...\n");
>>   
>> -    for_each_cpu ( cpu, &frozen_cpus )
>> +    for_each_present_cpu ( cpu )
>>       {
>> +        if ( park_offline_cpus ? cpu == smp_processor_id()
> 
> park_offline_cpus is x86 specific, so it will not build on Arm.

And that's intentional, even more so that (as said above) Arm doesn't
call here in the first place. And even if it did - whether to do things the
"new" way would then still (intentionally) depend on whether Arm had
any way of park_offline_cpus being "true".

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] x86/ACPI: re-park previously parked CPUs upon resume from S3
  2019-06-17  6:40     ` Jan Beulich
@ 2019-06-17  8:12       ` Julien Grall
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Julien Grall @ 2019-06-17  8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jan Beulich
  Cc: Stefano Stabellini, WeiLiu, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk, George Dunlap,
	Andrew Cooper, Ian Jackson, Tim Deegan, xen-devel

Hi Jan,

On 6/17/19 7:40 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 14.06.19 at 18:52, <julien.grall@arm.com> wrote:
>> The title and commit message are a bit odd to read because you are modifying
>> common code but everything is geared towards x86.
> 
> Indeed. There's no caller of {en,dis}able_nonboot_cpus() in Arm code
> at present, afaics. Hence the code changed (but not the file) is truly
> x86-specific at the moment. I've explicitly thought about the
> "inconsistency" between title and contents, but I've deliberately put it
> as is: The change _is_ x86 / ACPI only, _despite_ touching common
> code (and hence needing a REST maintainer ack).

Bear in mind that I have nearly no knowledge of x86, so trying to write 
a commit message fully the x86 way is not going to help me understand 
why this makes sense for everyone (today or in the future).

>>> @@ -207,15 +207,19 @@ void enable_nonboot_cpus(void)
>>>    
>>>        printk("Enabling non-boot CPUs  ...\n");
>>>    
>>> -    for_each_cpu ( cpu, &frozen_cpus )
>>> +    for_each_present_cpu ( cpu )
>>>        {
>>> +        if ( park_offline_cpus ? cpu == smp_processor_id()
>>
>> park_offline_cpus is x86 specific, so it will not build on Arm.
> 
> And that's intentional, even more so that (as said above) Arm doesn't
> call here in the first place. 

Calling and building are two separate things... A function may be built 
even if it is not called.

> And even if it did - whether to do things the
> "new" way would then still (intentionally) depend on whether Arm had
> any way of park_offline_cpus being "true".

Looking again, we are defining park_offline_cpus to false on Arm (see
a6448adfd3 "xen/cpu: Fix ARM build following c/s 597fbb8"). So there are 
no build issue as I first thought.

Cheers,

-- 
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, back to index

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-06-14 11:30 [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] x86: S3 resume adjustments Jan Beulich
2019-06-14 11:37 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/3] x86/ACPI: re-park previously parked CPUs upon resume from S3 Jan Beulich
2019-06-14 16:52   ` Julien Grall
2019-06-17  6:40     ` Jan Beulich
2019-06-17  8:12       ` Julien Grall
2019-06-14 11:37 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC 2/3] x86/ACPI: restore VESA mode " Jan Beulich
2019-06-14 11:38 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] x86: a little bit of 16-bit video mode setting code cleanup Jan Beulich

Xen-Devel Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/0 xen-devel/git/0.git
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/1 xen-devel/git/1.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 xen-devel xen-devel/ https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel \
		xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org xen-devel@archiver.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index xen-devel


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.xenproject.lists.xen-devel


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox