From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568BFC4708F for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 06:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED16861263 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 06:03:15 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org ED16861263 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.134667.250492 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lnxUa-0002ll-ON; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 06:03:08 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 134667.250492; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 06:03:08 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lnxUa-0002le-Kl; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 06:03:08 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 134667; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 06:03:07 +0000 Received: from all-amaz-eas1.inumbo.com ([34.197.232.57] helo=us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lnxUZ-0002ix-AD for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 06:03:07 +0000 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.29]) by us1-amaz-eas2.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 1692972c-a222-4f89-a4f6-a3a376e90a6a; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 06:03:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap.suse.de (imap-alt.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.47]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76A3A1FD2D; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 06:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap3-int (imap-alt.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.47]) by imap.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D066118DD; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 06:03:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.72]) by imap3-int with ESMTPSA id 8L6pCZnNtWBPeAAALh3uQQ (envelope-from ); Tue, 01 Jun 2021 06:03:05 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 1692972c-a222-4f89-a4f6-a3a376e90a6a DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1622527385; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yMU2JPgK0qmrP32rl8NH4eVDq1jiSBJi8A+N3bYsJck=; b=ELdXrf8UX1LeQoLnrsYffBU7wi3GWrbd82YxwCFGdDMVWw6mLp3Ql5fOr+CEEzyw4QxZWl UOlEwDoNL9zfNgIo974Rsfn1kOd0b218WBLKR9t+Fw/g9AWzJwJULAtQC26BmuqN4Zv1Ts 4yunzzirAiDtHnn6olNGsFtuRYMdcms= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1622527385; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=yMU2JPgK0qmrP32rl8NH4eVDq1jiSBJi8A+N3bYsJck=; b=ELdXrf8UX1LeQoLnrsYffBU7wi3GWrbd82YxwCFGdDMVWw6mLp3Ql5fOr+CEEzyw4QxZWl UOlEwDoNL9zfNgIo974Rsfn1kOd0b218WBLKR9t+Fw/g9AWzJwJULAtQC26BmuqN4Zv1Ts 4yunzzirAiDtHnn6olNGsFtuRYMdcms= Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] xen: Add files needed for minimal riscv build To: Connor Davis , Bob Eshleman Cc: Alistair Francis , Andrew Cooper , George Dunlap , Ian Jackson , Julien Grall , Stefano Stabellini , Wei Liu , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org References: <88ca49cea8dc0c44604957d42722388bb3d9e3ff.1621712830.git.connojdavis@gmail.com> <7d1b6d2a-641c-4508-9b29-b74db4769170@suse.com> <39a8a78c-3662-528f-fde4-d47427e64b15@gmail.com> From: Jan Beulich Message-ID: <0eab888a-4c48-497d-6c43-b749389e52dd@suse.com> Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 08:03:01 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Results: imap.suse.de; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.00 / 100.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.com:s=susede1]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCPT_COUNT_SEVEN(0.00)[10]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[gmail.com,citrix.com,xenproject.org,xen.org,kernel.org,lists.xenproject.org] On 01.06.2021 04:26, Connor Davis wrote: > > > On 5/25/21 12:13 PM, Bob Eshleman wrote: >> On 5/25/21 1:48 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 24.05.2021 16:34, Connor Davis wrote: >>>> Add arch-specific makefiles and configs needed to build for >>>> riscv. Also add a minimal head.S that is a simple infinite loop. >>>> head.o can be built with >>>> >>>> $ make XEN_TARGET_ARCH=riscv SUBSYSTEMS=xen -C xen tiny64_defconfig >>>> $ make XEN_TARGET_ARCH=riscv SUBSYSTEMS=xen -C xen TARGET=head.o >>>> >>>> No other TARGET is supported at the moment. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Connor Davis >>>> --- >>>> config/riscv.mk | 4 +++ >>>> xen/Makefile | 8 +++-- >>>> xen/arch/riscv/Kconfig | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> xen/arch/riscv/Kconfig.debug | 0 >>>> xen/arch/riscv/Makefile | 0 >>>> xen/arch/riscv/Rules.mk | 0 >>>> xen/arch/riscv/arch.mk | 14 ++++++++ >>>> xen/arch/riscv/asm-offsets.c | 0 >>>> xen/arch/riscv/configs/tiny64_defconfig | 13 +++++++ >>>> xen/arch/riscv/head.S | 6 ++++ >>>> xen/include/asm-riscv/config.h | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 11 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>> create mode 100644 config/riscv.mk >>>> create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/Kconfig >>>> create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/Kconfig.debug >>>> create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/Makefile >>>> create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/Rules.mk >>>> create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/arch.mk >>>> create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/asm-offsets.c >>>> create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/configs/tiny64_defconfig >>>> create mode 100644 xen/arch/riscv/head.S >>>> create mode 100644 xen/include/asm-riscv/config.h >>> I think this wants to be accompanied by an addition to ./MAINTAINERS >>> right away, such that future RISC-V patches can be acked by the >>> respective designated maintainers, rather than falling under "THE REST". >>> Question is whether you / we have settled yet who's to become arch >>> maintainer there. >>> >>> Jan >>> >> I'd like to volunteer myself for this, as I'm slated to continue >> with the port indefinitely and would at least like to review >> patches. If Connor has the time, I think it makes sense for him >> to be listed there too. >> >> Until we have others (it's just us two right now), it'll be a >> lot of us reviewing each other's arch-specific work (in addition to >> reviewers elsewhere in the Xen project, of course). >> >> -Bobby >> > Jan: can you list Bobby as the maintainer on commit? You can list me as > well, > but I can't guarantee a time commitment unlike Bobby. Well, actually I did expect a v5 submission with whatever entry you both deem suitable. Otoh I now realize that patch 1 had my extra request addressed (by myself) and hence with this one needing just that entry, I could indeed add that addition myself while committing. Let me move the mails back to the to-be-committed folder... Jan