From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ian Campbell Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] tools/libx{l, c}: Remove the toolstack_{save, restore} callbacks Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 11:09:34 +0100 Message-ID: <1438078174.11600.111.camel@citrix.com> References: <1437388679-16468-1-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> <1437388679-16468-3-git-send-email-andrew.cooper3@citrix.com> <1437560870.12884.7.camel@citrix.com> <55AF7971.2000205@citrix.com> <1437563686.12884.38.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1437563686.12884.38.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andrew Cooper , Xen-devel Cc: Ian Jackson , Wei Liu List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 12:14 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > +> development. It is should not be used.* > > > Does it needs to be accepted on restore for N->N+1 purposes (or N+M > > > for > > > M>1 since you care about that)? Or does the conversion routine turn > > > it > > > into something else? > > > > The libxc toolstack record was used in the #LIBXL_HVM_COMPAT phase, > > but > > nothing (not even the conversion script) will generate one any more. > > Perfect. By which I meant: Acked-by: Ian Campbell ?