On Fri, 2016-03-04 at 09:48 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> This is pretty simplistic for now, but I'd rather have someone better
> friends with the tools improve it (if desired).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
> 
> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl.c
> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl.c
> @@ -5958,6 +5958,26 @@ int libxl_send_debug_keys(libxl_ctx *ctx
>      return 0;
>  }
>  
> +int libxl_log_level(libxl_ctx *ctx, bool set, bool guest,
> +                    int *lower_thresh, int *upper_thresh)
>
Another thing I feel like saying is that having two actual functions,
one for _get and one for _set (perhaps implemented just as wrappers
around this one, which then would become an internal function) is, from
my point of view, a better interface, e.g., it is more in line with how
things are in libxl.

But this, I know, is mostly personal taste, and it's the taste of the
tools maintainers that counts. :-)

Regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)