From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 for Xen 4.7 3/4] libxl: enable per-VCPU
 parameter settings for RTDS scheduler
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 18:28:04 +0100
Message-ID: <1457544484.3102.452.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1457286958-5427-1-git-send-email-lichong659@gmail.com>
 <1457286958-5427-4-git-send-email-lichong659@gmail.com>
 <1457543367.3102.438.camel@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1908177058800785565=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <1457543367.3102.438.camel@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
 <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
 <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Sender: "Xen-devel" <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
To: Chong Li <lichong659@gmail.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Chong Li <chong.li@wustl.edu>, wei.liu2@citrix.com, Sisu Xi <xisisu@gmail.com>, george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, Meng Xu <mengxu@cis.upenn.edu>, dgolomb@seas.upenn.edu
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

--===============1908177058800785565==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-qxMOfL9LXArxHyzM9oKs"

--=-qxMOfL9LXArxHyzM9oKs
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2016-03-09 at 18:09 +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> While fiddling with the Cc-list, can you please try to arrange things
> in such a way that each person is Cc-ed only to the subset of the
> series that he would reasonably care about.
>=20
> For instance, Jan is likely not going to look at libxl and xl stuff,
> so
> no need bothering him with that. Similarly, IanJ wouldn't probably
> look
> at hypervisor stuff.
>=20
> If you are in doubt, stick to MAINTAINERS, with the exception that,
> if
> some random person commented on vX, he should be Cc-ed to vX+1, where
> the comments are addressed, no matter what he/she maintains.
>=20
> There are other exceptions, actually. For example, it's ok to Cc me
> to
> the whole series. This is hard to "set in stone", so again, if in
> doubt, follow the rule above... If people are interested in a patch
> that they happen not to be Cc-ed to, they'll find it via the mailing
> list.
>=20
To be fair, you are actually doing this already, and it was me that had
the wrong impression that you weren't.

So, good work with that, and sorry (you and everyone else) for the
noise on this. :-)

Dario
--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


--=-qxMOfL9LXArxHyzM9oKs
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEABECAAYFAlbgXSQACgkQk4XaBE3IOsR0IACfSgrAurpfuE8f0q3VPZI3i3PR
CFcAoJRct0jcm1AikcAbCN8xXncf9Es6
=9Bhi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-qxMOfL9LXArxHyzM9oKs--


--===============1908177058800785565==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs
IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVuLm9yZwpodHRwOi8vbGlzdHMueGVuLm9y
Zy94ZW4tZGV2ZWwK

--===============1908177058800785565==--