From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 for Xen 4.7 3/4] libxl: enable per-VCPU
 parameter for RTDS
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 19:04:11 +0200
Message-ID: <1459357451.5082.106.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1458336385-2606-1-git-send-email-lichong659@gmail.com>
 <1458336385-2606-4-git-send-email-lichong659@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0503697403923710933=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <1458336385-2606-4-git-send-email-lichong659@gmail.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
 <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
 <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Sender: "Xen-devel" <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
To: Chong Li <lichong659@gmail.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Cc: Chong Li <chong.li@wustl.edu>, wei.liu2@citrix.com, Sisu Xi <xisisu@gmail.com>, george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, Meng Xu <mengxu@cis.upenn.edu>, dgolomb@seas.upenn.edu
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

--===============0503697403923710933==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-1zLlUSrmAD8rncfcfgGv"

--=-1zLlUSrmAD8rncfcfgGv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2016-03-18 at 16:26 -0500, Chong Li wrote:
> Add libxl_vcpu_sched_params_get/set and sched_rtds_vcpu_get/set
> functions to support per-VCPU settings.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Chong Li <chong.li@wustl.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Meng Xu <mengxu@cis.upenn.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Sisu Xi <xisisu@gmail.com>
>=20
> ---
> Changes on PATCH v7:
> 1) Fix a mistake in sched_rtds_domain_set()
>=20
You happen to have done more than "just" this. In fact, I made some
comments unrelated to this issue, and you addressed them (which is a
good thing :-)).

It is ok for this to be a very very very quick summary, but it's only
useful if it is also complete.

In any case, this patch is:

Reviewed-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>

Thanks and Regards,
Dario
--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


--=-1zLlUSrmAD8rncfcfgGv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEABECAAYFAlb8BwwACgkQk4XaBE3IOsRqzwCfdT77GOguuqDkrslBcq6Bb5Hf
DfUAoIU3aMq2cheUZWSfW6jzf2B1kaOH
=vf7M
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-1zLlUSrmAD8rncfcfgGv--


--===============0503697403923710933==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs
IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVuLm9yZwpodHRwOi8vbGlzdHMueGVuLm9y
Zy94ZW4tZGV2ZWwK

--===============0503697403923710933==--