On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 10:25 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > On 05/04/16 08:57, Jan Beulich wrote: > >  > > > Signed-off-by: Chong Li > > > > > > Acked-by: Dario Faggioli > > This appears to be the 3rd variant of the patch, all with the same > > bogus subject, and no versioning information at all. Please > > remember that mails can arrive out of order, so there's no way > > to reliably tell which one got sent first. So for this to go in I'm > > expecting you to re-send with a proper subject and an indication > > that this is not the initial version of the patch. > And since this version of the patch is functionally different than > the > one Dario acked, you should drop his Acked-by as well. > Indeed you should have. But, with the subject fixed (something like "xen: sched: fix deadlock when changing scheduling parameters") and properly versioned, you can add it again: Acked-by: Dario Faggioli > Thanks for being responsive in fixing this bug; and sorry for all the > criticism, but OSS development is very detail-oriented, and it takes > a > while to internalize all the rules for how things should be done. > It does! :-) Thanks and Regards, Dario -- <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)