From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.7] travis: drop broken LLVM repos
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 12:09:11 +0200
Message-ID: <1465380551.15816.176.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1465315732-48921-1-git-send-email-cardoe@cardoe.com>
 <20160607162036.GA10987@citrix.com>
 <6f9577bf-5da4-fd0d-202e-018457d1cb7a@cardoe.com>
 <20160607173428.GB12783@citrix.com>
 <5758017802000078000F2F00@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0740528497967259011=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <5758017802000078000F2F00@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
 <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
 <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Sender: "Xen-devel" <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>, Wei
 Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, xen-devel@lists.xen.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

--===============0740528497967259011==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-mHaDRDxK1Jw3bG4l1Jhx"

--=-mHaDRDxK1Jw3bG4l1Jhx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 03:28 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 07.06.16 at 19:34, <wei.liu2@citrix.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 07, 2016 at 01:09:04PM -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
>=C2=A0
> >> Its not permanent but it is now unknown when they will return. I
> figured
> >> I'd toss this patch out there if the community would rather have
> some
> >> build tests that pass instead of no build tests that run.
> >=C2=A0
> > OK. I'm fine with taking this patch.
>=20
> Question then is - do we want this on just 4.7, or also unstable?
>=20
Both, I think?

So that, AFAIU the issue, people using travis will have both their 4.7
_and_ unstable build staring being tested again?

Dario
--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


--=-mHaDRDxK1Jw3bG4l1Jhx
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=bvSB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-mHaDRDxK1Jw3bG4l1Jhx--


--===============0740528497967259011==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs
IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVuLm9yZwpodHRwOi8vbGlzdHMueGVuLm9y
Zy94ZW4tZGV2ZWwK

--===============0740528497967259011==--