From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xen: sched: rtds refactor code Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 09:45:42 +0200 Message-ID: <1466754342.18398.85.camel@citrix.com> References: <1463356490-9780-1-git-send-email-tiche@seas.upenn.edu> <1463356490-9780-2-git-send-email-tiche@seas.upenn.edu> <9ace7d3c-886c-6a57-644a-54fcf448854f@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2518355168737224602==" Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta6.messagelabs.com ([85.158.143.247]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bGLoF-0008N1-KM for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 24 Jun 2016 07:45:51 +0000 In-Reply-To: <9ace7d3c-886c-6a57-644a-54fcf448854f@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Sender: "Xen-devel" To: George Dunlap , Meng Xu Cc: xen-devel , Tianyang Chen List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============2518355168737224602== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Z9sLDStyTTsHG2HKsR43" --=-Z9sLDStyTTsHG2HKsR43 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2016-06-23 at 11:42 +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > On 22/06/16 17:16, Meng Xu wrote: > >=C2=A0 > > I think he is trying to align those comments to make them start > > from > > the same column. I was confused at the reason at the very > > beginning. > > Then I pulled his repo and checked this change. > Right -- well neither you as a reviewer nor anyone in the future > looking > back at this changeset should have to try to guess what the purpose > was; > if he did want to align them, that's perfectly fine, it just needs a > brief mention in the changelog. :-) >=20 Indeed. BTW, I don't recall if we discussed this alignment previously,neither, in case we did, what my position was back then :-P In any case, I (now) think that having these comments aligned on a per-struct base is just fine, and there really is no need to have _all_ of them aligned, across all structs. I don't have a super strong opinion on this, and I'd be fine with it, if Meng is. I just think it's not worth the effort (of patching, reviewing, checking in, etc.) Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-Z9sLDStyTTsHG2HKsR43 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJXbOUmAAoJEBZCeImluHPu9jQQALOcmZKUO33uhu/FEOmnEHJH N26NURLiKM8ORR2weQedlVjZu2tZYjin6pSOP73n4H6y2WYbOBFAeJGFiTeOxul7 PCna+lnimhtx8bzQKCqcjgsNIcQEwzPe8AUBRjuBr10R0iW6xdwjzGFfKCEMw3K5 1rsLMBXsDlrkn8LCYtOfbUwcsDAIpoCnvUbeGj0hp7ibz4blmooAjn/68cwpP8hg bXIKTnYH+ND5ExKphQ9XFxd6lKzVG0NiBNrLydu4ujDofG/uytsgqhsxbgTSiidR TdWR3+ibtZu0zyGHGifUETiQyb4tvKvp6wHr5QwhKNlkueEf6sk83ALBWHmNr5M/ B0dHvJPGJzpnTEcEQBPvZX+wqCZFpncsEKCOBFehcc8kgT8BHzMqda/c0n+TGUow BZZqwCmDpoKIadOC1aRcHozu6mJKJVfyzhhZvQ29IqE9WJSw/duayxvV96M4sxuj eESvA2Yvtv08txzj7PXdPRPVdYe8mICq8b5HOn35mTab7ImY9WlY1hdgXlvG8E5K xvYm2V+6R4jbGPAyLNhEUVzNkp+Prm/oJjVOXqbDetJtnusC2iOchOsdXASXT4K1 Ta3DMEDe8y4get8+rQwte7Y70ECyIn6H9rx7WXMwg/LO7rQJRpkwDXifwApTWpnx qXe5AGKMzzQhm1fqft42 =pmXm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Z9sLDStyTTsHG2HKsR43-- --===============2518355168737224602== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVuLm9yZwpodHRwOi8vbGlzdHMueGVuLm9y Zy94ZW4tZGV2ZWwK --===============2518355168737224602==--