From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: dependences for backporting to 4.6 [was: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xen: Have schedulers revise initial placement] Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2016 12:21:04 +0200 Message-ID: <1471342864.6806.11.camel@citrix.com> References: <1468605722-24239-1-git-send-email-george.dunlap@citrix.com> <1468605722-24239-2-git-send-email-george.dunlap@citrix.com> <579F434B0200007800101346@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <1470054737.3311.0.camel@citrix.com> <57A4AFA70200007800103367@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <1470967188.6250.48.camel@citrix.com> <57ADF0F002000078001057BB@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1842972937893533256==" Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bZbUe-0001fx-0o for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 16 Aug 2016 10:21:12 +0000 In-Reply-To: <57ADF0F002000078001057BB@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Sender: "Xen-devel" To: Jan Beulich Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Anshul Makkar , MengXu , George Dunlap List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============1842972937893533256== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+gRrANLjHj0ODGQMkU5h" --=-+gRrANLjHj0ODGQMkU5h Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2016-08-12 at 07:53 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > On 12.08.16 at 03:59, wrote: > > So, I'm not sure whether the best route here is: > > =C2=A0- fully backport 6b53bb4ab3c9b; > > =C2=A0- backport only the last hunk of 6b53bb4ab3c9b as its own patch; > > =C2=A0- fold the last hunk of 6b53bb4ab3c9b in the backport of George's= =C2=A0 > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0patch (I mean, what was 83dff3992a89 in staging-4.6); > >=20 > > Thoughts? > First of all - thanks a lot for helping out here.=20 > :-) > With above extra > commit things are indeed back to normal again for me. Since the > adjustments to that commit to make it apply were mostly > mechanical, I think I'd prefer taking the entire backport.=20 > Fine. > Same > for 4.5 then, were the backport adjusted for 4.6 then applied > cleanly. >=20 So, you've done the backports yourself, and you don't want/need me to do them right? I'm asking because that's how I read what you're saying here, but I don't see that having happened in staging-{4.5,4.6}. If that's me failing to check, or checking in the wrong place, sorry for the noise. Regards, Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-+gRrANLjHj0ODGQMkU5h Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCAAGBQJXsukRAAoJEBZCeImluHPungoP/jpaujCooFaSHm3+zhnMKkGl PBlAOAQ3w3B8CYW156FCMqIkz029GFawAFhTYSCKNQpaX8sdfq3+R6RK2YZBDouX yiRvMQ4xPBrDdcDUSHh3+Eh8r+R0qmI4Q181KIKcOA6U3+RwuGpUUb1v5c7nC+tx l9ekOcAYYdpbmsV5hUBbhaJPdNJe0TDw6PSs70FdB9XOXm8HTZmXvoO5EzuB0i5M k577faSDhrI8r3PBxJnj9KjYfC+26fijHOpA3wI+RutbOyFewHQIxeWqn/saJaJf 6xfjrYf+DtsGbn6Z1yZx/DvvCjJgwtFwSLanDYYckTYrDwo1FStbQfE0AC+pRRLW zCWyejm+QTwBY7y+ES7BmduJNQiNT1E5hy4iClrZlL8p4SFC5I7mW1zAKOcQzqzT Zm8jP9n0gYFHTwxAP6CPFseJlvMoL5kheSBj+GUV8x5iyPzU7y9MIjG14UQEhkLv 6PE4DSIk4UGIcTLteeg1SzkcRUAHo42XL9msAlkbg5Z1csQDJCTw+o4AUXx2mRSk rlUQwmI1FeQG/2Ld/netdU2U7q817eI7TSfbsKL94FbiEQ56L3M2CE0VDGE8OF7D e+9aeWldyMIU3t1sWV3V4EBMS587l3S17Q9FHXhHWydkq4VOQY++WcUIXNVHlEMx ceiFZxs71ppHy8HBt2jJ =TcM6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-+gRrANLjHj0ODGQMkU5h-- --===============1842972937893533256== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVuLm9yZwpodHRwczovL2xpc3RzLnhlbi5v cmcveGVuLWRldmVsCg== --===============1842972937893533256==--