On Thu, 2017-06-01 at 02:50 +0530, Praveen Kumar wrote:
> First, move some code around in order to make the next change more
> obvious.
> 
> commit 16c047add3ceaf0ab882e3e094d1ec904d02312d from linux tree
> 
> Signed-off-by: Praveen Kumar <kpraveen.lkml@gmail.com>
>
Mmm... actually, I am not absolutely sure of what's the formal process
that we follow in this case is, but I think that:
*) it is legally required (or at least preferable) that, at least the 
   Signed-off-by, of the original authors of the patches are reported 
   here;
*) legally required or not, I think it's very useful to have them, and 
   not only the S-o-b, but also the Acks, and all the other tags (like 
   you had in the first posting of this series). You probably should 
   add your own Signed-off-by, at the bottom of the list (this, you 
   didn't do it in first posting of the series)

I appreciate that you probably removed the tags to prevent git-send-
email to use the enclosed email address and spam everyone, but I'm sure
there is a way of telling git-send-email itself, to avoid doing that,
even if you leave the tags and the emails in the patches' changelogs
(something like a command line options, or similar.. I don't use it, so
I can't tell).

Regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)