On Wed, 2017-06-28 at 19:43 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:09 PM, Dario Faggioli
> <dario.faggioli@citrix.com> wrote:
> > Note that a cap is considered valid only if
> > it is within the [1, nr_vcpus]% interval.
> 
> Oh, I see you added the check here.
> 
Yeah...

> Still, I think we should add a check in the hypervisor too.  The
> check
> here should mainly be to give a reasonable error message; we
> shouldn't
> rely on it for safety.
> 
...sure, I totally agree.

Will do.

Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)