Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 6/6] xen/arm: clarify the support status of iomem configurations

[Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>]

Hi,

On 07/08/2019 10:08, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 07/08/2019 01:23, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> iomem settings fall under the broader category of "Non-PCI device
>> passthrough": they are not security supported. Make it clearer.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefanos@xilinx.com>
>> CC: tim@xen.org
>> CC: konrad.wilk@oracle.com
>> CC: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>
>> CC: JBeulich@suse.com
>> CC: andrew.cooper3@citrix.com
>> CC: ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com
>> CC: wei.liu2@citrix.com

I just realized after sending the e-mail that the list of CC is smaller than it 
should and Wei's e-mail is incorrect. On the other e-mails, you forgot to CC 
Volodymyr as Arm reviewer.

I am pretty sure I already pointed that out in the past... We have tools in 
place to find out the maintainers to CC and add them (see 
scripts/add_maintainers.pl). So there are no need to do this manually anymore.

>> ---
>>   SUPPORT.md | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/SUPPORT.md b/SUPPORT.md
>> index 375473a456..bc6fb58e04 100644
>> --- a/SUPPORT.md
>> +++ b/SUPPORT.md
>> @@ -639,7 +639,7 @@ to be used in addition to QEMU.
>>       Status: Experimental
>> -### ARM/Non-PCI device passthrough
>> +### ARM/Non-PCI device passthrough and other iomem configurations
> 
> I don't understand the new title. What are the other use case of IOMEM 
> configurations?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
>>       Status: Supported, not security supported
>>
> 

-- 
Julien Grall

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel