From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98413C433B4 for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:39:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 426AB613CE for ; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:39:23 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 426AB613CE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=suse.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.120565.228006 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lcUIV-0001hS-RR; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:39:15 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 120565.228006; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:39:15 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lcUIV-0001hJ-OK; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:39:15 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 120565; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:39:14 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lcUIU-0001hC-LO for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:39:14 +0000 Received: from mx2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.15]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id e5b5e21b-3273-437d-95b3-307bd612ccfa; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1267DB03A; Fri, 30 Apr 2021 14:39:13 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: e5b5e21b-3273-437d-95b3-307bd612ccfa X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.com; s=susede1; t=1619793553; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cxnHY9uHGZKFgWwQkgl02BIYlcwztSONzTXf93EqENc=; b=JfY+w0UIbIVsCdGH2BNEJTkQXoBnE6Jm2WUaIndiTsPpNMlF780h6tA1aVTaWCqnv9c1fY Z9xJn3fyK/JJwYNQaNAXFIJrlZXa4HUyeBltiq1MXarv8lOxtfHq7eCDslJaRTNJHdl/of z00X2eWN8W+TSPJ/yQ/7s9ZdD0/OXns= Cc: Andrew Cooper , Wei Liu , =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=c3=a9?= , Ian Jackson From: Jan Beulich Subject: [PATCH 0/3] firmware/shim: build adjustments To: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" Message-ID: <19695ffc-34d8-b682-b092-668f872d4e57@suse.com> Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2021 16:39:12 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Originally I meant to finally get v2 of "firmware/shim: honor symlinks during Xen tree setup" sorted. However, the suggestion to use find's -L option, while a suitable equivalent of the -xtype primary, has the same drawback: It doesn't distinguish between relative and absolute symlinks (and we specifically want to skip relative ones). Locally I'm using '(' -type f -o -lname '/*' ')' now, but -lname again being non- standard I didn't think it would even be worth submitting. While looking into that I did notice a few other anomalies, though, which this series tries to address. I notice tools/firmware/xen-dir/ isn't included in "X86 ARCHITECTURE". I wonder whether that should be added. 1: update linkfarm exclusions 2: drop XEN_CONFIG_EXPERT uses 3: UNSUPPORTED=n Jan