From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Martin Lucina Subject: Re: [PATCH] xenconsole: Ensure exclusive access to console using locks Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 15:42:22 +0200 Message-ID: <20150724134222.GF25338@nodbug.lucina.net> References: <1437738262.24746.79.camel@citrix.com> <1437742310-14193-1-git-send-email-martin@lucina.net> <21938.15968.711376.627272@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZIdEy-00019i-Qu for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 13:42:20 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <21938.15968.711376.627272@mariner.uk.xensource.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Jackson Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Wei Liu , Ian Campbell , Stefano Stabellini List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Friday, 24.07.2015 at=A014:32, Ian Jackson wrote: > > +static void console_lock(int domid) > > +{ > > + lockfile =3D malloc(PATH_MAX); > > + if (lockfile =3D=3D NULL) > > + err(ENOMEM, "malloc"); > > + snprintf(lockfile, PATH_MAX - 1, "%s/xenconsole.%d", XEN_LOCK_DIR, do= mid); > = > Why not use asprintf ? asprintf is a GNU/BSD extension, not available on e.g. Solaris. Do we care about that? > You should use the same recipe as with-lock-ex (from chiark-utils) > = > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/ucgi/~ian/git?p=3Dchiark-utils.git;a= =3Dblob;f=3Dcprogs/with-lock-ex.c;h=3D1850d1f0283bd61fc1da12458cba7ec0a227c= 572;hb=3DHEAD > = > (which we also use in tools/hotplug/Linux/locking.sh and > tools/libxl/libxl_internal.c:libxl__lock_domain_userdata) Thanks for the pointers, I'll use that strategy. Martin