Re: [GRUB2 PATCH v4 1/4] i386/relocator: Add grub_relocator64_efi relocator

From: Daniel Kiper <daniel.kiper@oracle.com>
To: Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Cc: "jgross@suse.com" <jgross@suse.com>,
	"grub-devel@gnu.org" <grub-devel@gnu.org>,
	"eric.snowberg@oracle.com" <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
	"arvidjaar@gmail.com" <arvidjaar@gmail.com>,
	"andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
	"cardoe@cardoe.com" <cardoe@cardoe.com>,
	"pgnet.dev@gmail.com" <pgnet.dev@gmail.com>,
	"roy.franz@linaro.org" <roy.franz@linaro.org>,
	"ning.sun@intel.com" <ning.sun@intel.com>,
	"david.vrabel@citrix.com" <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
	"jbeulich@suse.com" <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	"stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com"
	<stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	"qiaowei.ren@intel.com" <qiaowei.ren@intel.com>,
	"richard.l.maliszewski@intel.com"
	<richard.l.maliszewski@intel.com>,
	"gang.wei@intel.com" <gang.wei@intel.com>,
	"fu.wei@linaro.org" <fu.wei@linaro.org>,
	"seth.goldberg@oracle.com" <seth>
Subject: Re: [GRUB2 PATCH v4 1/4] i386/relocator: Add grub_relocator64_efi relocator
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 20:59:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160315195955.GB31771__25806.9213050932$1458072108$gmane$org@olila.local.net-space.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEaD8JO23MkxBVF7ZqL8pDDz_85Nof1kbMo-RtxMam8S2KOeOg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 05:00:33PM +0100, Vladimir 'phcoder' Serbinenko wrote:
> Other than 2 typos (inline). Looks good. Let's give it a day if somebody
> wants to object, then I'll commit it
>
> >
> >         movq    %rax, %rsp
> >
> > +       /*
> > +        * Here is grub_relocator64_efi_start() entry point.
> > +        * Following code is shared between grub_relocator64_efi_start()
> > +        * and grub_relocator64_start().
> > +        *
> > +        * Think twice before changing anything below!!!
> > +        */
> >
> above?

Why? Everything outside of grub_relocator64_efi_start (above
grub_relocator64_efi_start) and grub_relocator64_efi_end (below
grub_relocator64_efi_end) is used by one function. So, we can
quite safely change anything there. However, everything between
grub_relocator64_efi_start (__below__ grub_relocator64_efi_start
label) and grub_relocator64_efi_end is owned by two functions. Hence,
every change should take into account that. Am I missing something?

> > +       /* Here grub_relocator64_efi_start() ends. Ufff... */
> > +VARIABLE(grub_relocator64_efi_end)
> > +
> >
> Probably without _start. Comment probably applies even more here than above.

Nope, grub_relocator64_efi_start is entry point, so, grub_relocator64_efi_end
label marks end of grub_relocator64_efi_start() func.

>  Are you ok with me moving ends to the same place when comitting?  This

If you wish. However, I think that grub_relocator64_efi_start() should
contain only code/data which is really used by it. Otherwise, it could
make some confusion. Why unused code/data is owned by grub_relocator64_efi_start()?
Is by design or by mistake?

> would make the code less error-prone.

I am not convinced that it will be less error-prone then. If we wish
that maybe we should not share code in that way... ;-)))

Daniel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel