Wei Liu, on Fri 25 Mar 2016 13:09:07 +0000, wrote:
> CC Samuel

Thanks.

> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 02:26:51PM -0700, Sarah Newman wrote:
> > 7c8f3483 introduced a break within a loop in netfront.c such that
> > cons and nr_consumed were no longer always being incremented. The
> > offset at cons will be processed multiple times with the break in
> > place.
> > 
> > Remove the break and re-add "some !=0" in the loop for HAVE_LIBC.

Mmm, right.

That ifdef makes things even more difficult to understand then. That
however makes me think: how about the attached patch, which actually
simplifies the rest.

Thanks!
Samuel