xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Keir Fraser <keir@xen.org>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>,
	Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86/hvm: separate ioreq server code from generic hvm code
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 14:22:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160406132201.GO18120@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160406132004.GB10861@citrix.com>

On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 02:20:04PM +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 12:07:25PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > On 04/01/2016 03:54 AM, Paul Durrant wrote:
> > >The code in hvm/hvm.c related to handling I/O emulation using the ioreq
> > >server framework is large and mostly self-contained.
> > >
> > >This patch separates the ioreq server code into a new hvm/ioreq.c source
> > >module and accompanying asm-x86/hvm/ioreq.h header file. There is no
> > >intended functional change, only code movement.
> > 
> > This may be more than just code movement. It breaks PVH. I haven't looked at
> > what exactly is breaking but I figured I'd give a heads-up.
> > 
> 
> Paul and Jan, this needs to be fixed, otherwise we will have to revert
> this patch (and subsequents patches that depend on this one).
> 

Oops, I guess this is already fixed by Boris in
e43b27a5999befcb6948622938253afc4345968b.

Sorry for the noise.

Wei.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

      reply	other threads:[~2016-04-06 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-01  7:54 [PATCH v2] x86/hvm: separate ioreq server code from generic hvm code Paul Durrant
2016-04-01 13:50 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-01 14:04   ` Wei Liu
2016-04-01 14:35 ` Jan Beulich
2016-04-01 14:53   ` Paul Durrant
2016-04-04 16:07 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-06 13:20   ` Wei Liu
2016-04-06 13:22     ` Wei Liu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160406132201.GO18120@citrix.com \
    --to=wei.liu2@citrix.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=Paul.Durrant@citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=keir@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).