From: Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>
To: "Ni, Ruiyu" <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
Cc: "edk2-devel@lists.01.org" <edk2-devel@lists.01.org>,
Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
Subject: Re: [edk2] OVMF broken under Xen (in PCI initialisation)
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 16:40:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160426084000.GD3109__21213.5590533309$1461660099$gmane$org@GaryWorkstation> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D0DA25B98@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 08:19:49AM +0000, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
> Gary,
> Maybe the system boots to Shell well but the video isn't initialized properly.
> Can you build the firmware using "-D DEBUG_ON_SERIAL_PORT" switch and
> give me the boot log?
>
Hi Ray,
I already did and it's how I make the firmware spit the log :-(
Thanks,
Gary Lin
> Regards,
> Ray
>
> From: Gary Lin [mailto:glin@suse.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 3:35 PM
> To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
> Cc: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] OVMF broken under Xen (in PCI initialisation)
>
> On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 06:43:56AM +0000, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ray
> >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-bounces@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Anthony PERARD
> > >Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 10:48 PM
> > >To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
> > >Cc: Xen Devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>>
> > >Subject: [edk2] OVMF broken under Xen (in PCI initialisation)
> > >
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >Following the switch to MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe, the pci root
> > >bridge does not finish to initialize and breaks under Xen.
> > >
> > >There are several issue probably due to the use of
> > >PcdPciDisableBusEnumeration=TRUE.
> > >
> > >First one:
> > >ASSERT MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciRootBridgeIo.c(99): Bridge->Mem.Limit < 0x0000000100000000ULL
> > >
> > >This patch would fix the first assert:
> > >diff --git a/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/Xen.c b/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/Xen.c
> > >index 7fa9019..15ec7a7 100644
> > >--- a/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/Xen.c
> > >+++ b/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/Xen.c
> > >@@ -227,5 +227,11 @@ InitializeXen (
> > >
> > > PcdSetBool (PcdPciDisableBusEnumeration, TRUE);
> > >
> > >+ // Values from hvmloader
> > >+#define PCI_MEM_END 0xFC000000
> > >+#define HVM_BELOW_4G_MMIO_START 0xF0000000
> > >+ PcdSet64 (PcdPciMmio32Base, HVM_BELOW_4G_MMIO_START);
> > >+ PcdSet64 (PcdPciMmio32Size, PCI_MEM_END - HVM_BELOW_4G_MMIO_START);
> > >+
> > > return EFI_SUCCESS;
> > > }
> > >
> > >
> > >But that not enough, next assert is:
> > >ASSERT MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciDeviceSupport.c(807): RootBridge != ((void *) 0)
> > >
> > >I have worked around this one with the following patch. That would
> > >correspond to how the former implementation in OvmfPkg was initializing the
> > >struct. Maybe a better way would be to fill ResAllocated under Xen,
> > >somehow. Under Xen, the ResAllocNode status is not allocated, so no
> > >Descriptor are created.
> > >
> > >diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciRootBridgeIo.c
> > >b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciRootBridgeIo.c
> > >index cda9b49..eda92b6 100644
> > >--- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciRootBridgeIo.c
> > >+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciRootBridgeIo.c
> > >@@ -1509,15 +1509,13 @@ RootBridgeIoConfiguration (
> > >
> > > ResAllocNode = &RootBridge->ResAllocNode[Index];
> > >
> > >- if (ResAllocNode->Status != ResAllocated) {
> > >- continue;
> > >- }
> > >-
> > > Descriptor->Desc = ACPI_ADDRESS_SPACE_DESCRIPTOR;
> > > Descriptor->Len = sizeof (EFI_ACPI_ADDRESS_SPACE_DESCRIPTOR) - 3;
> > >+ if (ResAllocNode->Status != ResAllocated) {
> > > Descriptor->AddrRangeMin = ResAllocNode->Base;
> > > Descriptor->AddrRangeMax = ResAllocNode->Base + ResAllocNode->Length - 1;
> > > Descriptor->AddrLen = ResAllocNode->Length;
> > >+ }
> > > switch (ResAllocNode->Type) {
> > >
> > I think a more proper fix is to return EFI_UNSUPPORTED without returning any
> > descriptors when the PcdPciDisableBusEnumeration is TRUE.
> > Per UEFI Spec, EFI_UNSUPPORTED means "The current configuration of this PCI
> > root bridge could not be retrieved." It's true when the PCD is true.
> >
> > >
> > >That leads to one last assert:
> > >> QemuVideo: Cirrus 5446 detected
> > >> InstallProtocolInterface: 09576E91-6D3F-11D2-8E39-00A0C969723B 7B9EF598
> > >> Adding Mode 0 as Cirrus Internal Mode 0: 640x480, 32-bit, 60 Hz
> > >> Adding Mode 1 as Cirrus Internal Mode 1: 800x600, 32-bit, 60 Hz
> > >> Adding Mode 2 as Cirrus Internal Mode 2: 1024x768, 24-bit, 60 Hz
> > >> PixelBlueGreenRedReserved8BitPerColor
> > >> ASSERT /local/home/sheep/work/ovmf/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciBusDxe/PciIo.c(1789): ((BOOLEAN)(0==1))
> > >For this one, I've workaround by reverting patch 7b0a1ea
> > >(MdeModuelPkg/PciBus: Return AddrTranslationOffset in GetBarAttributes).
> > >That issue was introduce while still using the USE_OLD_PCI_HOST.
> > >
> > >Any idee or pointer on how to fix those issues ?
> >
> > When the PciRootBridgeIo.Configuration() returns EFI_UNSUPPORTED, this assertion
> > can be fixed as well. Correct?
>
> I tried to make RootBridgeIoConfiguration() return EFI_UNSUPPORTED
> (see the attachment), and those asserts were gone. However, the system
> stuck somewhere after loading shell.efi. Here are the messages from the
> debug log:
>
> BdsLibConnectAll
> Select Item: 0xE
> Memory Previous Current Next
> Type Pages Pages Pages
> ====== ======== ======== ========
> 0A 00000004 00000001 00000004
> 09 00000008 00000011 00000015
> 00 00000004 00000001 00000004
> 06 00000024 00000057 0000006C
> 05 00000030 00000063 0000007B
> 03 00000180 0000048D 000005B0
> 04 00000F00 00000B65 00000F00
> Booting EFI Internal Shell
> InstallProtocolInterface: 5B1B31A1-9562-11D2-8E3F-00A0C969723B 3EA580C0
> Loading driver at 0x0003E03F000 EntryPoint=0x0003E03F240 Shell.efi
> InstallProtocolInterface: BC62157E-3E33-4FEC-9920-2D3B36D750DF 3EA58B98
> InstallProtocolInterface: 387477C2-69C7-11D2-8E39-00A0C969723B 3EA54320
> InstallProtocolInterface: 752F3136-4E16-4FDC-A22A-E5F46812F4CA 3EA53CD8
> InstallProtocolInterface: 6302D008-7F9B-4F30-87AC-60C9FEF5DA4E 3E16B580
>
> I couldn't find out where it stuck unless there is a way to attach gdb
> to Xen HVM for source level debugging :-(
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gary Lin
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-26 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20160422144736.GD1885@perard.uk.xensource.com>
2016-04-25 11:43 ` [edk2] OVMF broken under Xen (in PCI initialisation) Laszlo Ersek
[not found] ` <571E02C5.1000906@redhat.com>
2016-04-26 6:29 ` Gary Lin
[not found] ` <20160426062914.GB3109@GaryWorkstation>
2016-04-26 6:45 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2016-04-26 6:43 ` Ni, Ruiyu
[not found] ` <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D0DA25884@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2016-04-26 7:35 ` Gary Lin
[not found] ` <20160426073529.GC3109@GaryWorkstation>
2016-04-26 8:19 ` Ni, Ruiyu
[not found] ` <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D0DA25B98@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2016-04-26 8:40 ` Gary Lin [this message]
[not found] ` <20160426084000.GD3109@GaryWorkstation>
2016-04-26 9:40 ` Ni, Ruiyu
[not found] ` <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D0DA25D38@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2016-04-27 4:29 ` Gary Lin
[not found] ` <20160427042907.GH3109@GaryWorkstation>
2016-04-27 5:39 ` Ni, Ruiyu
[not found] ` <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D0DA27D1E@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2016-04-27 6:54 ` Gary Lin
[not found] ` <20160427065428.GJ3109@GaryWorkstation>
2016-04-27 7:18 ` Ni, Ruiyu
[not found] ` <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D0DA27F59@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2016-04-27 8:26 ` Gary Lin
[not found] ` <20160427082641.GK3109@GaryWorkstation>
2016-04-27 9:48 ` Ni, Ruiyu
2016-04-27 9:50 ` Ni, Ruiyu
[not found] ` <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D0DA291E5@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2016-04-27 10:43 ` Laszlo Ersek
[not found] ` <572097E4.1070300@redhat.com>
2016-04-28 5:08 ` Ni, Ruiyu
[not found] ` <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D0DA29FD5@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2016-04-28 9:12 ` Gary Lin
[not found] ` <20160428091209.GL3109@GaryWorkstation>
2016-04-28 9:44 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-28 10:35 ` Laszlo Ersek
[not found] ` <5721E77C.7080701@redhat.com>
2016-05-05 8:03 ` Ni, Ruiyu
[not found] ` <734D49CCEBEEF84792F5B80ED585239D0DA479DB@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com>
2016-05-05 9:12 ` Wei Liu
2016-05-05 9:22 ` Gary Lin
2016-04-26 9:31 ` Andrew Cooper
2016-04-26 10:03 ` Gary Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='20160426084000.GD3109__21213.5590533309$1461660099$gmane$org@GaryWorkstation' \
--to=glin@suse.com \
--cc=edk2-devel@lists.01.org \
--cc=ruiyu.ni@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).