From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Borislav Petkov Subject: Re: efi_enabled(EFI_PARAVIRT) use Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 10:25:02 +0200 Message-ID: <20160429082501.GA20762@pd.tnic> References: <20160429142020.4499e185@canb.auug.org.au> <20160429063936.GA28320@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160429063936.GA28320@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ingo Molnar , Matt Fleming Cc: Stephen Rothwell , "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Stefano Stabellini , Xen Devel , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shannon Zhao , Ard Biesheuvel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 08:39:36AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > With considerable pain we just got rid of paravirt_enabled() in the > x86 tree, and Xen is now reintroducing it in the EFI code. I think Matt is working towards removing EFI_PARAVIRT but he'll comment himself when he wakes up... :) -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.