xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, '@char.us.oracle.com
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Tamas K Lengyel <tamas@tklengyel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] x86/mem-sharing: Bulk mem-sharing entire domains
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 10:02:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160615140214.GD9254@char.us.oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57612A7702000078000F5202@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 02:14:15AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 14.06.16 at 18:33, <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote:
> >> +        /* Check for continuation if it's not the last iteration. */
> >> +        if ( limit > ++bulk->start && hypercall_preempt_check() )
> > 
> > I surprised the compiler didn't complain to you about lack of parenthesis.
> 
> I'm puzzled - what kind of warning would you expect here? The
> compiler -  afaik - treats relational operators vs logical AND/OR as
> having well known precedence wrt to one another; what iirc it
> would warn about is lack of parentheses in an expression using
> both of the logical operators, as people frequently don't know
> that && has higher precedence than ||.

Maybe those are the warnings I had seen in the past. I recall
that with a more modern compiler it would give me suggestions to
use parenthesis. But I honestly can't recall the details.

Either way - the code is fine.
> 
> Jan
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-15 14:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-11 23:24 [PATCH v5 1/2] x86/mem-sharing: Bulk mem-sharing entire domains Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-11 23:24 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] tests/mem-sharing: Add bulk option to memshrtool Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-12  0:08 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] x86/mem-sharing: Bulk mem-sharing entire domains Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-14  9:56 ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-14 16:33 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
     [not found]   ` <CABfawhmqhAsEk=J5F3y0tAvd74xfi1_2-A+tfKzwCapcmL1zPg@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]     ` <CABfawh=Hw-mZi+d751pRhA-C-wLOJ3TQPkW6rLAYp+GGGbxx1Q@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]       ` <CABfawhnZVFt2Hwrfb+DNH3ft3gbB3Bc4+h7EpJfXbf=1_P-LWQ@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]         ` <CABfawhkTvytb7NvHJ-AHJBCxA3wJ5Fo-ciV66JpSY-xdK+3v5Q@mail.gmail.com>
2016-06-14 16:42           ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-06-15  8:14   ` Jan Beulich
2016-06-15 14:02     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2016-06-22 15:38 ` George Dunlap
2016-06-23 15:42   ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-07-05 14:35     ` George Dunlap
2016-07-05 14:58       ` Tamas K Lengyel
2016-07-05 14:59       ` Jan Beulich

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160615140214.GD9254@char.us.oracle.com \
    --to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc='@char.us.oracle.com \
    --cc=JBeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=tamas@tklengyel.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).