xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Xen Devel <Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the tip tree
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2017 15:20:16 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170828152016.635096c0@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the xen-tip tree got conflicts in:

  arch/x86/xen/xen-asm.S
  arch/x86/xen/xen-asm_64.S

between commit:

  edcb5cf84f05 ("x86/paravirt/xen: Remove xen_patch()")

from the tip tree and commits:

  ad5b8c4ba323("xen: get rid of paravirt op adjust_exception_frame")
  bd830917233b ("paravirt,xen: remove xen_patch()")

from the xen-tip tree.

I fixed it up (edcb5cf84f05 and bd830917233b ate more or less the same
patch, so I just used the latter version files) and can carry the fix
as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

             reply	other threads:[~2017-08-28  5:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-28  5:20 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-10-28  6:16 linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the tip tree Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-31  4:37 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-31  4:26 Stephen Rothwell
2017-08-31  8:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-08-31  9:00   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-08-31  9:16     ` Ingo Molnar
2017-08-31 12:36       ` Joe Perches
2017-08-31 10:11     ` Juergen Gross
2017-08-31 12:00       ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-08-31 14:01         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-08-31 14:03           ` Juergen Gross
2017-08-31 18:30           ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-08-17  4:03 Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-28  4:21 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-12  4:30 Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-26  4:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-04-12  4:20 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-29  3:36 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-29  3:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-29  3:35 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-29  8:37 ` Juergen Gross
2017-03-29  8:59   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-29  9:28     ` Juergen Gross
2017-03-29 10:06       ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-04-03 18:03         ` Juergen Gross
2017-04-04 16:04           ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2017-04-04 16:09             ` Juergen Gross
2017-04-05  6:25             ` Juergen Gross
2017-04-03 14:38       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-04-03 14:55         ` Juergen Gross
2017-03-29  9:54     ` Juergen Gross
2017-03-29 10:41       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-03-29 11:13       ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-10-03  1:29 Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-26  4:02 Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-26  4:01 Stephen Rothwell
2016-07-26 13:58 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-07-18  6:17 Stephen Rothwell
2016-05-02  4:51 Stephen Rothwell
2016-04-29  4:20 Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-12  5:09 Stephen Rothwell
2015-08-12 13:27 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-08-12 17:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-12 17:38     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-12 17:46     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-12 18:17       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-08-12 18:26         ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-08-12 18:30           ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-08-12 18:26         ` H. Peter Anvin
2015-08-12 18:36           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-12 18:44             ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-08-12 19:04               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-13  6:45                 ` Ingo Molnar
2014-03-20  4:15 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170828152016.635096c0@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).