From: "Roger Pau Monné" <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: Roman Shaposhnik <roman@zededa.com>
Cc: "jgross@suse.com" <jgross@suse.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@citrix.com>,
"jbeulich@suse.com" <jbeulich@suse.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
"boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com" <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] After upgrade to Xen 4.12.0 iommu=no-igfx
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 10:36:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190731083631.63vqxrdr5vyeeswn@Air-de-Roger> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMmSBy8U3druT0V_9ADojAyQxn7KTWARMsZ08DZ_5EWU43qDAg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 10:55:24AM -0700, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> Sorry -- got a bit distracted yesterday. Attached is the log with only
> your latest patch attached. Interestingly enough the box booted fine
> without screen artifacts. So I guess we're getting closer...
>
> Thanks for all the help!
That's quite weird, there's no functional changes between the
previous patches and this one, the only difference is that this patch
has more verbose output.
Are you sure you didn't have any local patches on top of Xen that
could explain this difference in behaviour?
Thanks, Roger.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-07-31 8:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-19 19:31 [Xen-devel] [BUG] After upgrade to Xen 4.12.0 iommu=no-igfx Roman Shaposhnik
2019-07-19 20:02 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2019-07-22 8:20 ` Paul Durrant
2019-07-22 11:48 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-07-22 11:54 ` Paul Durrant
2019-07-22 13:48 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-07-22 14:03 ` Paul Durrant
2019-07-22 14:39 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-07-22 15:02 ` Paul Durrant
2019-07-22 15:21 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-07-22 23:36 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2019-07-22 23:47 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-07-23 17:32 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2019-07-23 17:35 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-07-23 17:48 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2019-07-23 17:50 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-07-23 17:58 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2019-07-23 18:12 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-07-23 18:25 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2019-07-26 7:58 ` Jan Beulich
2019-07-30 17:56 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2019-07-31 8:34 ` Jan Beulich
2019-07-31 8:58 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-07-31 9:30 ` Jan Beulich
2019-07-31 19:37 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2019-07-24 12:00 ` Jan Beulich
2019-07-24 12:04 ` Jan Beulich
2019-07-24 11:23 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-07-24 11:40 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-07-24 14:11 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-07-26 0:47 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2019-07-26 9:35 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-07-30 9:21 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-07-30 17:55 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2019-07-31 8:31 ` Jan Beulich
2019-07-31 8:36 ` Roger Pau Monné [this message]
2019-07-31 8:43 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-07-31 19:35 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2019-07-31 19:46 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-07-31 21:03 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2019-08-01 8:15 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-08-01 18:25 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2019-08-02 8:05 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-08-06 16:17 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-08-06 21:48 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2019-08-07 7:08 ` Jan Beulich
2019-08-07 9:57 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-08-07 10:03 ` Jan Beulich
2019-08-07 7:35 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-08-07 8:31 ` Jan Beulich
2019-08-07 10:17 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-08-12 8:57 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-08-13 19:24 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2019-08-14 8:06 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-08-19 5:00 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2019-08-19 8:16 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-08-20 2:03 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2019-08-01 7:35 ` Jan Beulich
2019-07-31 19:30 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2019-08-01 8:45 ` Roger Pau Monné
2019-08-01 18:19 ` Roman Shaposhnik
2019-07-20 16:39 ` Andrew Cooper
2019-07-22 8:03 ` Paul Durrant
2019-07-24 17:42 ` Rich Persaud
2019-07-26 1:13 ` Roman Shaposhnik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190731083631.63vqxrdr5vyeeswn@Air-de-Roger \
--to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=Paul.Durrant@citrix.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=roman@zededa.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).