From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118A8C4332B for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:59:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D563B20775 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:59:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=citrix.com header.i=@citrix.com header.b="UveY6oCP" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D563B20775 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=citrix.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jGgLE-0007uN-Jr; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:59:24 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1jGgLD-0007uH-CR for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:59:23 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: 2285fb56-6db6-11ea-92cf-bc764e2007e4 Received: from esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com (unknown [216.71.155.144]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 2285fb56-6db6-11ea-92cf-bc764e2007e4; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:59:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=citrix.com; s=securemail; t=1585043962; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=scqAF46m8fm46zHVpDK8ouhJrPM6KlTUavNCLaH4Hgs=; b=UveY6oCPFdnWElzGXdYT8fq8P3uqPs5N3NjYbffktG0oJXqV7cg+nXVX 1GigOI2HY5zVVP1giutcxuaJx59r27p+4BItJ9XRjxDYMSxYUEP/M0B3C rXrNIjru//2bNSwa9ZLWB1jrK8G+Zb8SRS8Z8TT9meT15cC2HxX9kM58c E=; Authentication-Results: esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none; spf=None smtp.pra=roger.pau@citrix.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=roger.pau@citrix.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@mail.citrix.com Received-SPF: None (esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of roger.pau@citrix.com) identity=pra; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-sender="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: domain of roger.pau@citrix.com designates 162.221.158.21 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-sender="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"; x-record-text="v=spf1 ip4:209.167.231.154 ip4:178.63.86.133 ip4:195.66.111.40/30 ip4:85.115.9.32/28 ip4:199.102.83.4 ip4:192.28.146.160 ip4:192.28.146.107 ip4:216.52.6.88 ip4:216.52.6.188 ip4:162.221.158.21 ip4:162.221.156.83 ip4:168.245.78.127 ~all" Received-SPF: None (esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail.citrix.com) identity=helo; client-ip=162.221.158.21; receiver=esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; envelope-from="roger.pau@citrix.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail.citrix.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible IronPort-SDR: /SiijygM8le17ghxDf0GDUOOTErZ50gzXvhEuDuT7E1Km+2jk4SLJsDszQhtw9TemTmdiUfVLe FTZi2yOkp5yBDlhXKLmYtp4RqxAtMqSNxUdO5zk35BtFIUq07OZEC0KUGYcZ+FD7tySvjZNycL pAuOQCo57kdmRt0qltowl32ueaS5KfiJeuswcgMe+HAtP+wmHT79zqjRekBBKVXMO1qS0KeGgV t1YANph95mnoGKHY7Q07+xoPs+d45taknyuU3zEe5J6z00DN+v5e9PW5TIHivvo7/89wFUSWH+ 6qk= X-SBRS: 2.7 X-MesageID: 15173479 X-Ironport-Server: esa4.hc3370-68.iphmx.com X-Remote-IP: 162.221.158.21 X-Policy: $RELAYED X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,300,1580792400"; d="scan'208";a="15173479" Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:59:15 +0100 From: Roger Pau =?utf-8?B?TW9ubsOp?= To: "Tian, Kevin" Message-ID: <20200324095915.GG24458@Air-de-Roger.citrite.net> References: <20200320190737.42110-1-roger.pau@citrix.com> <20200320190737.42110-4-roger.pau@citrix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-ClientProxiedBy: AMSPEX02CAS01.citrite.net (10.69.22.112) To AMSPEX02CL02.citrite.net (10.69.22.126) Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] x86/nvmx: update exit bitmap on vmexit X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , Wei Liu , Jan Beulich , "Nakajima, Jun" , Andrew Cooper Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 06:22:43AM +0000, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > From: Roger Pau Monne > > Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2020 3:08 AM > > > > Current code in nvmx_update_apicv set the guest interrupt status field > > but doesn't update the exit bitmap, which can cause issues of lost > > interrupts on the L1 hypervisor if vmx_intr_assist gets > > short-circuited by nvmx_intr_intercept returning true. > > Above is not accurate. Currently Xen didn't choose to update the EOI > exit bitmap every time when there is a change. Instead, it chose to > batch the update before resuming to the guest. sort of optimization. > So it is not related to whether SVI is changed. We should always do the > bitmap update in nvmx_update_apicv, regardless of the setting of > Ack-on-exit ... But if Ack on exit is not set the GUEST_INTR_STATUS won't be changed by nvmx_intr_intercept, and hence there's no need to update the EOI exit map? If OTOH the GUEST_INTR_STATUS field is changed by vmx_intr_assist the bitmap will already be updated there. Thanks, Roger.