From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5913C433E0 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 10:20:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B955B207C4 for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 10:20:58 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B955B207C4 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=citrix.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jbLqA-0002Zg-12; Wed, 20 May 2020 10:20:46 +0000 Received: from us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com ([172.99.69.81]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jbLq9-0002Zb-1j for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 10:20:45 +0000 X-Inumbo-ID: 9037e76e-9a83-11ea-b07b-bc764e2007e4 Received: from esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com (unknown [216.71.155.168]) by us1-rack-iad1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 9037e76e-9a83-11ea-b07b-bc764e2007e4; Wed, 20 May 2020 10:20:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.i=none IronPort-SDR: Y4wQz6edF6UM0teSuTD5OyGrhtAOEpz14EK6fx5zCHKyQPc4kiUvJ2KOSNipNdLnnvbuIjrEFx IQh6qCgjbOsQaD6HJUdnto7z5H1A2AaYjBXm0VC6AKzaLDRoNpESKHoxMOIgXV1gi9Dc8/7B8v cF5Tv+YVImQhjO51/eQ4l2pPIsPFiGqKF1rDc/3Nol4yaNYCaSnURs5O0SgPfTnXnVkwIFcSs1 W7Rgm+AnRY3i5nIsf6gC/UoANPDG54jCA8Da3ff4BNCyhPcZ22GWiVCOXYOfbAV8cPHInBYtM7 pAU= X-SBRS: 2.7 X-MesageID: 18230849 X-Ironport-Server: esa5.hc3370-68.iphmx.com X-Remote-IP: 162.221.158.21 X-Policy: $RELAYED X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,413,1583211600"; d="scan'208";a="18230849" Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 12:20:35 +0200 From: Roger Pau =?utf-8?B?TW9ubsOp?= To: Jan Beulich Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] x86: relax GDT check in arch_set_info_guest() Message-ID: <20200520093656.GJ54375@Air-de-Roger> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-ClientProxiedBy: AMSPEX02CAS02.citrite.net (10.69.22.113) To AMSPEX02CL02.citrite.net (10.69.22.126) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" , Wei Liu , Andrew Cooper Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Sender: "Xen-devel" On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 09:53:50AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > It is wrong for us to check frames beyond the guest specified limit > (in the compat case another loop bound is already correct). > > Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné Thanks, Roger.