From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, peterz@infradead.org,
luto@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Deep Shah <sdeep@vmware.com>,
"VMware, Inc." <pv-drivers@vmware.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] x86/xen: drop USERGS_SYSRET64 paravirt call
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 18:08:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201202170823.GF2951@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6be0d1a5-0079-5d90-0c38-85fe4471f1b8@suse.com>
On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 03:48:21PM +0100, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> I wanted to avoid the additional NOPs for the bare metal case.
Yeah, in that case it gets optimized to a single NOP:
[ 0.176692] SMP alternatives: ffffffff81a00068: [0:5) optimized NOPs: 0f 1f 44 00 00
which is nopl 0x0(%rax,%rax,1) and I don't think that's noticeable on
modern CPUs where a NOP is basically a rIP increment only and that goes
down the pipe almost for free. :-)
> If you don't mind them I can do as you are suggesting.
Yes pls, I think asm readability is more important than a 5-byte NOP.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-02 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-20 11:46 [PATCH v2 00/12] x86: major paravirt cleanup Juergen Gross
2020-11-20 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] x86/xen: use specific Xen pv interrupt entry for MCE Juergen Gross
2020-12-09 21:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-20 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] x86/xen: use specific Xen pv interrupt entry for DF Juergen Gross
2020-12-09 21:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-20 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] x86/pv: switch SWAPGS to ALTERNATIVE Juergen Gross
2020-11-27 11:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-09 21:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-11-20 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] x86/xen: drop USERGS_SYSRET64 paravirt call Juergen Gross
2020-12-02 12:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-02 14:48 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-12-02 17:08 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2020-11-20 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] x86: rework arch_local_irq_restore() to not use popf Juergen Gross
2020-11-20 11:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-20 12:05 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-11-22 6:55 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-11-22 21:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-11-23 5:21 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-11-23 15:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-12-09 13:27 ` Mark Rutland
2020-12-09 14:02 ` Mark Rutland
2020-12-09 14:05 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-12-09 18:15 ` Mark Rutland
2020-12-09 18:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-10 11:10 ` Mark Rutland
2020-12-10 20:15 ` x86/ioapic: Cleanup the timer_works() irqflags mess Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-11 5:10 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-11-27 2:20 ` [x86] 97e8f0134a: fio.write_iops 8.6% improvement kernel test robot
2020-11-20 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] x86/paravirt: switch time pvops functions to use static_call() Juergen Gross
2020-11-20 12:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-20 12:07 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-11-20 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] x86: add new features for paravirt patching Juergen Gross
2020-12-08 18:43 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-09 7:30 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-12-09 12:03 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-09 12:22 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-12-10 17:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-11-20 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] x86/paravirt: remove no longer needed 32-bit pvops cruft Juergen Gross
2020-11-20 12:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-20 12:16 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-11-20 16:52 ` Arvind Sankar
2020-11-20 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] x86/paravirt: switch iret pvops to ALTERNATIVE Juergen Gross
2020-11-20 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] x86/paravirt: add new macros PVOP_ALT* supporting pvops in ALTERNATIVEs Juergen Gross
2020-11-20 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] x86/paravirt: switch functions with custom code to ALTERNATIVE Juergen Gross
2020-11-20 15:46 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-25 15:46 ` [x86/paravirt] fd8d46a7a2: kernel-selftests.livepatch.test-callbacks.sh.fail kernel test robot
2020-11-20 11:46 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] x86/paravirt: have only one paravirt patch function Juergen Gross
2020-11-20 14:18 ` kernel test robot
2020-11-20 12:53 ` [PATCH v2 00/12] x86: major paravirt cleanup Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-23 13:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-15 11:42 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-12-15 14:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-15 14:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-15 15:07 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-12-16 0:38 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-12-16 8:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-16 16:56 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-12-16 17:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201202170823.GF2951@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pv-drivers@vmware.com \
--cc=sdeep@vmware.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).