From: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
mpe@ellerman.id.au, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, jgross@suse.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org,
"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
sstabellini@kernel.org, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
grant.likely@arm.com, xypron.glpk@gmx.de,
Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>,
mingo@kernel.org, bauerman@linux.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
linux-devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Nicolas Boichat <drinkcat@chromium.org>,
Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@broadcom.com>,
Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
Subject: [PATCH v4 08/14] swiotlb: Use restricted DMA pool if available
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 14:21:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210209062131.2300005-9-tientzu@chromium.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210209062131.2300005-1-tientzu@chromium.org>
Regardless of swiotlb setting, the restricted DMA pool is preferred if
available.
The restricted DMA pools provide a basic level of protection against the
DMA overwriting buffer contents at unexpected times. However, to protect
against general data leakage and system memory corruption, the system
needs to provide a way to lock down the memory access, e.g., MPU.
Signed-off-by: Claire Chang <tientzu@chromium.org>
---
include/linux/swiotlb.h | 13 +++++++++++++
kernel/dma/direct.h | 2 +-
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/swiotlb.h b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
index f13a52a97382..76f86c684524 100644
--- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h
+++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
@@ -71,6 +71,15 @@ dma_addr_t swiotlb_map(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t phys,
#ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
extern enum swiotlb_force swiotlb_force;
+#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL
+bool is_swiotlb_force(struct device *dev);
+#else
+static inline bool is_swiotlb_force(struct device *dev)
+{
+ return unlikely(swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE);
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL */
+
bool is_swiotlb_buffer(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr);
void __init swiotlb_exit(void);
unsigned int swiotlb_max_segment(void);
@@ -80,6 +89,10 @@ phys_addr_t get_swiotlb_start(struct device *dev);
void __init swiotlb_adjust_size(unsigned long new_size);
#else
#define swiotlb_force SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE
+static inline bool is_swiotlb_force(struct device *dev)
+{
+ return false;
+}
static inline bool is_swiotlb_buffer(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t paddr)
{
return false;
diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.h b/kernel/dma/direct.h
index 7b83b1595989..b011db1b625d 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/direct.h
+++ b/kernel/dma/direct.h
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ static inline dma_addr_t dma_direct_map_page(struct device *dev,
phys_addr_t phys = page_to_phys(page) + offset;
dma_addr_t dma_addr = phys_to_dma(dev, phys);
- if (unlikely(swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE))
+ if (is_swiotlb_force(dev))
return swiotlb_map(dev, phys, size, dir, attrs);
if (unlikely(!dma_capable(dev, dma_addr, size, true))) {
diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
index e22e7ae75f1c..6fdebde8fb1f 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
+++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL
+#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_fdt.h>
@@ -109,6 +110,10 @@ static struct swiotlb default_swiotlb;
static inline struct swiotlb *get_swiotlb(struct device *dev)
{
+#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL
+ if (dev && dev->dev_swiotlb)
+ return dev->dev_swiotlb;
+#endif
return &default_swiotlb;
}
@@ -508,7 +513,7 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t orig_addr,
size_t mapping_size, size_t alloc_size,
enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
{
- struct swiotlb *swiotlb = &default_swiotlb;
+ struct swiotlb *swiotlb = get_swiotlb(hwdev);
dma_addr_t tbl_dma_addr = phys_to_dma_unencrypted(hwdev, swiotlb->start);
unsigned long flags;
phys_addr_t tlb_addr;
@@ -519,7 +524,11 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t orig_addr,
unsigned long max_slots;
unsigned long tmp_io_tlb_used;
+#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL
+ if (no_iotlb_memory && !hwdev->dev_swiotlb)
+#else
if (no_iotlb_memory)
+#endif
panic("Can not allocate SWIOTLB buffer earlier and can't now provide you with the DMA bounce buffer");
if (mem_encrypt_active())
@@ -641,7 +650,7 @@ void swiotlb_tbl_unmap_single(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
size_t mapping_size, size_t alloc_size,
enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
{
- struct swiotlb *swiotlb = &default_swiotlb;
+ struct swiotlb *swiotlb = get_swiotlb(hwdev);
unsigned long flags;
int i, count, nslots = ALIGN(alloc_size, 1 << IO_TLB_SHIFT) >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
int index = (tlb_addr - swiotlb->start) >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
@@ -689,7 +698,7 @@ void swiotlb_tbl_sync_single(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t tlb_addr,
size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir,
enum dma_sync_target target)
{
- struct swiotlb *swiotlb = &default_swiotlb;
+ struct swiotlb *swiotlb = get_swiotlb(hwdev);
int index = (tlb_addr - swiotlb->start) >> IO_TLB_SHIFT;
phys_addr_t orig_addr = swiotlb->orig_addr[index];
@@ -801,6 +810,11 @@ late_initcall(swiotlb_create_default_debugfs);
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL
+bool is_swiotlb_force(struct device *dev)
+{
+ return unlikely(swiotlb_force == SWIOTLB_FORCE) || dev->dev_swiotlb;
+}
+
static int rmem_swiotlb_device_init(struct reserved_mem *rmem,
struct device *dev)
{
--
2.30.0.478.g8a0d178c01-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-09 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-09 6:21 [PATCH v4 00/14] Restricted DMA Claire Chang
2021-02-09 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 01/14] swiotlb: Remove external access to io_tlb_start Claire Chang
2021-02-09 8:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-09 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 02/14] swiotlb: Move is_swiotlb_buffer() to swiotlb.c Claire Chang
2021-02-09 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 03/14] swiotlb: Add struct swiotlb Claire Chang
2021-02-09 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 04/14] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_late_init_with_tbl Claire Chang
2021-02-09 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 05/14] swiotlb: Add DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL Claire Chang
2021-02-09 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 06/14] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA pool Claire Chang
2021-02-09 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 07/14] swiotlb: Update swiotlb API to gain a struct device argument Claire Chang
2021-02-09 6:21 ` Claire Chang [this message]
2021-02-09 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 09/14] swiotlb: Refactor swiotlb_tbl_{map,unmap}_single Claire Chang
2021-02-09 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 10/14] dma-direct: Add a new wrapper __dma_direct_free_pages() Claire Chang
2021-02-09 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 11/14] swiotlb: Add is_dev_swiotlb_force() Claire Chang
2021-02-09 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 12/14] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA alloc/free support Claire Chang
2021-02-26 4:17 ` Claire Chang
2021-02-26 5:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-02-26 9:35 ` Claire Chang
2021-02-09 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 13/14] dt-bindings: of: Add restricted DMA pool Claire Chang
2021-03-10 16:07 ` Will Deacon
2021-03-10 21:40 ` Rob Herring
2021-03-11 5:04 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-02-09 6:21 ` [PATCH v4 14/14] of: Add plumbing for " Claire Chang
2021-04-22 8:20 ` [PATCH v4 00/14] Restricted DMA Claire Chang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210209062131.2300005-9-tientzu@chromium.org \
--to=tientzu@chromium.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=drinkcat@chromium.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=grant.likely@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=james.quinlan@broadcom.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=treding@nvidia.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).