xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>
To: <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>
Cc: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>,
	Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Wei Liu <wl@xen.org>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/irq: simplify loop in unmap_domain_pirq
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:22:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210210092211.53359-1-roger.pau@citrix.com> (raw)

The for loop in unmap_domain_pirq is unnecessary complicated, with
several places where the index is incremented, and also different
exit conditions spread between the loop body.

Simplify it by looping over each possible PIRQ using the for loop
syntax, and remove all possible in-loop exit points.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
---
 xen/arch/x86/irq.c | 60 +++++++++++++---------------------------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
index 032fe82167..856714b5bf 100644
--- a/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/irq.c
@@ -2305,7 +2305,6 @@ done:
 /* The pirq should have been unbound before this call. */
 int unmap_domain_pirq(struct domain *d, int pirq)
 {
-    unsigned long flags;
     struct irq_desc *desc;
     int irq, ret = 0, rc;
     unsigned int i, nr = 1;
@@ -2356,11 +2355,23 @@ int unmap_domain_pirq(struct domain *d, int pirq)
     if ( msi_desc != NULL )
         pci_disable_msi(msi_desc);
 
-    spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
-
-    for ( i = 0; ; )
+    for ( i = 0; i < nr; i++, info = pirq_info(d, pirq + i) )
     {
+        unsigned long flags;
+
+        if ( !info || info->arch.irq <= 0 )
+        {
+            printk(XENLOG_G_ERR "dom%d: MSI pirq %d not mapped\n",
+                   d->domain_id, pirq + i);
+            continue;
+        }
+        irq = info->arch.irq;
+        desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
+
+        spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
+
         BUG_ON(irq != domain_pirq_to_irq(d, pirq + i));
+        BUG_ON(desc->msi_desc != msi_desc + i);
 
         if ( !forced_unbind )
             clear_domain_irq_pirq(d, irq, info);
@@ -2378,45 +2389,6 @@ int unmap_domain_pirq(struct domain *d, int pirq)
             desc->msi_desc = NULL;
         }
 
-        if ( ++i == nr )
-            break;
-
-        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
-
-        if ( !forced_unbind )
-           cleanup_domain_irq_pirq(d, irq, info);
-
-        rc = irq_deny_access(d, irq);
-        if ( rc )
-        {
-            printk(XENLOG_G_ERR
-                   "dom%d: could not deny access to IRQ%d (pirq %d)\n",
-                   d->domain_id, irq, pirq + i);
-            ret = rc;
-        }
-
-        do {
-            info = pirq_info(d, pirq + i);
-            if ( info && (irq = info->arch.irq) > 0 )
-                break;
-            printk(XENLOG_G_ERR "dom%d: MSI pirq %d not mapped\n",
-                   d->domain_id, pirq + i);
-        } while ( ++i < nr );
-
-        if ( i == nr )
-        {
-            desc = NULL;
-            break;
-        }
-
-        desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
-        BUG_ON(desc->msi_desc != msi_desc + i);
-
-        spin_lock_irqsave(&desc->lock, flags);
-    }
-
-    if ( desc )
-    {
         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
 
         if ( !forced_unbind )
@@ -2427,7 +2399,7 @@ int unmap_domain_pirq(struct domain *d, int pirq)
         {
             printk(XENLOG_G_ERR
                    "dom%d: could not deny access to IRQ%d (pirq %d)\n",
-                   d->domain_id, irq, pirq + nr - 1);
+                   d->domain_id, irq, pirq + i);
             ret = rc;
         }
     }
-- 
2.29.2



             reply	other threads:[~2021-02-10  9:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-10  9:22 Roger Pau Monne [this message]
2021-02-19 14:39 ` [PATCH] x86/irq: simplify loop in unmap_domain_pirq Jan Beulich
2021-02-22 14:56   ` Roger Pau Monné

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210210092211.53359-1-roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --to=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=jbeulich@suse.com \
    --cc=wl@xen.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).