From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E878C433F5 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:23:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3649361056 for ; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:23:39 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 mail.kernel.org 3649361056 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=goodmis.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.223513.386267 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mk7Qa-0004UR-HA; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 16:23:24 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 223513.386267; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 16:23:24 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mk7Qa-0004UK-DO; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 16:23:24 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 223513; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 16:23:22 +0000 Received: from se1-gles-flk1-in.inumbo.com ([94.247.172.50] helo=se1-gles-flk1.inumbo.com) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mk7QY-0004UC-IX for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 16:23:22 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by se1-gles-flk1.inumbo.com (Halon) with ESMTPS id 2f01954c-40b0-11ec-a9d2-d9f7a1cc8784; Mon, 08 Nov 2021 17:23:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E868D61284; Mon, 8 Nov 2021 16:23:14 +0000 (UTC) X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" X-Inumbo-ID: 2f01954c-40b0-11ec-a9d2-d9f7a1cc8784 Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 11:23:13 -0500 From: Steven Rostedt To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Alan Stern , Geert Uytterhoeven , LKML , Arnd Bergmann , Ayush Sawal , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Rohit Maheshwari , Vinay Kumar Yadav , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, rcu@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v0 00/42] notifiers: Return an error when callback is already registered Message-ID: <20211108112313.73d0727e@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20211108101157.15189-1-bp@alien8.de> <20211108101924.15759-1-bp@alien8.de> <20211108141703.GB1666297@rowland.harvard.edu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 8 Nov 2021 15:35:50 +0100 Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 03:24:39PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > I guess I can add another indirection to notifier_chain_register() and > > avoid touching all the call sites. > > IOW, something like this below. > > This way I won't have to touch all the callsites and the registration > routines would still return a proper value instead of returning 0 > unconditionally. I prefer this method. Question, how often does this warning trigger? Is it common to see in development? -- Steve